I'm not writing them off, as I said, it was an anecdotal opinion, and there are many things that podiatrists do very well. However, I stand by what I said: IN MY EXPERIENCE, and in that of many people I know, podiatrists in general are fairly quick to recommend surgery.
It is my opinion that, in the US, at least, this is probably related to insurance reimbursement patterns. Routine podiatric care is often a specific exclusion, but surgery usually is covered. Therefore, it makes practical sense for them to recommend surgery to a patient who is not progressing quickly, because it is more likely to be covered by insurance, and less likely to require a large number of therapeutic visits that the insurer will balk at covering. I know that it is hugely difficult to make a living providing medical services that insurance won't cover, so I understand completely why that might happen, and that if they do this they are doing their best to help people get good outcomes with treatment they can afford.
However, electing to cut a bone is always a big deal, so it deserves careful forethought and an opinion not just from more than one physician, but from more than one specialty, because particularly when you are talking about the feet, a non-surgical alternative that works will spare you a lot of additional pain and everyday difficulty in getting around (including driving.) I'd say this about any type of provider if treatment they are recommending will have a major effect on your everyday life.