VandVsmama
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,961
I think this is awesome. you SHOULD be able to meet Darth Vader in Star Wars-land! I'm stoked that Mando is in Galaxy's Edge now, too...he's awesome.
Fantasyland literally has characters from different movies and time periodsI know I’m very much in the minority on this opinion, but to me this breaks the theme of the land and turns it into just another greatest hits land.
Whatever your opinion is of the Sequel Trilogy, at least Disney was trying to make something unique and focused. Should it have just been Original Trilogy based to begin with? Maybe. But by making this change, it now thematically makes no sense.
Think if they put modern humvees in Indy or had Sallah talking on a cell phone in the safety spiel. People would call that out for being obvious errors in the period. That’s how some Star Wars Fans will see this change.
If Disney wants to make Galaxy’s Edge OT, then they should retheme Rise of the Resistance to that period, and change the ship in the First Order (Now Imperial?) area to be something more in line with that era as well.
I know I sound picky, but it’s details like that WDI usually is very specific about and I’d hate for them to just phone this in.
Again, I’m sure I’m very much in the minority with my opinion.Fantasyland literally has characters from different movies and time periods
This is also what Fans have asked for, the time line was dumb and made it where the characters people wanted to see were locked away. They tested it with Luke last year and it worked and now we get Han and more
I know I’m very much in the minority on this opinion, but to me this breaks the theme of the land and turns it into just another greatest hits land.
Whatever your opinion is of the Sequel Trilogy, at least Disney was trying to make something unique and focused. Should it have just been Original Trilogy based to begin with? Maybe. But by making this change, it now thematically makes no sense.
Think if they put modern humvees in Indy or had Sallah talking on a cell phone in the safety spiel. People would call that out for being obvious errors in the period. That’s how some Star Wars Fans will see this change.
If Disney wants to make Galaxy’s Edge OT, then they should retheme Rise of the Resistance to that period, and change the ship in the First Order (Now Imperial?) area to be something more in line with that era as well.
I know I sound picky, but it’s details like that WDI usually is very specific about and I’d hate for them to just phone this in.
This is a good point. I remember the first time I went there and discovering that the outcome of Smuggler’s Run no longer would follow you into Oga’s Cantina as I had heard it was meant to. That was a little disappointing.I would probably be more disappointed with this if Disney hadn’t cheapened out and had delivered on the promises about the interactive and story-based dimensions of the land to begin with. Instead a bunch of it was held back for the closed Starcruiser experience because… well, that cost $4k+ to do it.
Ultimately, the sequels haven’t drive the same interest and love into the series that the originals did for my generation so back to the greatest hits it is.
I know I’m very much in the minority on this opinion, but to me this breaks the theme of the land and turns it into just another greatest hits land.
Whatever your opinion is of the Sequel Trilogy, at least Disney was trying to make something unique and focused. Should it have just been Original Trilogy based to begin with? Maybe. But by making this change, it now thematically makes no sense.
Think if they put modern humvees in Indy or had Sallah talking on a cell phone in the safety spiel. People would call that out for being obvious errors in the period. That’s how some Star Wars Fans will see this change.
If Disney wants to make Galaxy’s Edge OT, then they should retheme Rise of the Resistance to that period, and change the ship in the First Order (Now Imperial?) area to be something more in line with that era as well.
I know I sound picky, but it’s details like that WDI usually is very specific about and I’d hate for them to just phone this in.
Yeah, I do see a lot of people with that opinion.See, I prefer a "greatest hits" land. The whole total immersion "it's real" put on was a bit much. I blame Wizarding World for that. Like, it's a theme park!
That's not to say that I didn't really like SWGE the way it is either - I thought it was great! I just don't think it has to be SO immersive (like when the menus didn't even tell you what "Tip-Yip" was!
But the problem was that it wasn't immersive in the way it was planned to be. There was tons of dead space and quiet areas. It was all just kind of "off." They originally were going to have fight sequences on roofs and motion all around. The land as it ended up was just kind of "there" and left me pretty disappointed.See, I prefer a "greatest hits" land. The whole total immersion "it's real" put on was a bit much. I blame Wizarding World for that. Like, it's a theme park!
That's not to say that I didn't really like SWGE the way it is either - I thought it was great! I just don't think it has to be SO immersive (like when the menus didn't even tell you what "Tip-Yip" was!
I know I’m very much in the minority on this opinion, but to me this breaks the theme of the land and turns it into just another greatest hits land.
That comparison doesn't make sense. Fantasyland was not created around a specific movie franchise. Galaxy's Edge was.Fantasyland literally has characters from different movies and time periods
This is part of the reason why I love the Lego Star Wars shorts on Disney+. They do not take themselves too seriously, they are not overly concerned with official canon, especially as it related to the timeline, and are just incredibly enjoyable silly fun. I wish the parks (or at least Disneyland) would have gone more with that kind of vibe.It's okay to make the land just a mix/multiverse.
The timeline is now doneThat comparison doesn't make sense. Fantasyland was not created around a specific movie franchise. Galaxy's Edge was.
The story sends Luke, Leia, and Chewbacca to Batuu on a secret mission for critical intelligence—only for the trio to uncover a dangerous relic that puts them directly in the Empire’s crosshairs.
Fantasyland literally has characters from different movies and time periods
That comparison doesn't make sense. Fantasyland was not created around a specific movie franchise. Galaxy's Edge was.
Probably; we'll have to see how they handle this. There's been some discussion of keeping different-era characters in different parts of GE. But whatever happens in GE, your comparison to Fantasyland is still not relevant.The timeline is now done
I don't know who "you guys" are. I have not stated an opinion one way or another about adding original trilogy characters to GE. I was simply pointing out that doing so is a much different situation than adding characters from a different movie to Fantasyland.So anyone can show up. If you guys want lore then this is portal for the world between worlds and because of that anyone can show up
Probably; we'll have to see how they handle this. There's been some discussion of keeping different-era characters in different parts of GE. But whatever happens in GE, your comparison to Fantasyland is still not relevant.
Right up there with "New Coke".My 6 year old son loves Star Wars. You would think he's into the newer characters. When we visit Galaxy's Edge, his question is where's Darth Vader?
A 6+ year mistake for the ages (since the land opened).