rajak73
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2002
- Messages
- 1,922
.....sorry, just struck me as REALLY FUNNY!![]()
I know, after I posted this and reread it I laughed too! You'll notice I'm putting "footballs" now.

.....sorry, just struck me as REALLY FUNNY!![]()
When are they going to apologize for Mortenson's erroneous reporting that 11 of 12 balls were under by 2? I swear, ESPN has no credibility anymore.So, it seems ESPN has finally apologized for reporting false stories about the Patriots (taping of the Rams walk through)......anyone else up for eating a little crow?
When are they going to apologize for Mortenson's erroneous reporting that 11 of 12 balls were under by 2? I swear, ESPN has no credibility anymore.
Nice try. When asked, Mort said he rechecked with his sources after the first day or so (I forget) and it was confirmed to him that what he reported was accurate. He was supposed to be on a show a week or so ago and he cancelled because they were going to ask him why he hadn't apologized for the reporting. I think he later issued a statement that he was sorry for something silly like being a part of the focus but didn't actually apologize or recant the bogus info.ehhhhh, so it was really only 1 that was under by about 2 PSI.....maybe when they reported it, while pressing the "1" key the reporter sneezed, causing it to repeat, therefore showing as "11
Since they were only a few ticks under, and 3 of the 4 Colts balls were also a few ticks under (gee, didn't test any more than that!), I just scratch my head that this is still a "thing" and people are still so crazy that the Pat's are CHEATERS!!!I say it's thrown out...
No matter the outcome, this will probably not be over for years. Both sides have major interest in having the legal win, as the larger matter at stake now is important parts of the CBA. Neither side wants the other to gain the upper hand in who/how the league can administer discipline.I think it'll be done by the close of business today.
It would be extraordinarily unusual for a judge to both overrule an arbitrator, and deliver summary judgment about the evidence/facts of the case (which is probably beyond the scope of what he's reviewing right now). The best TB can hope for is for an order to have a new arbitrator hear the appeal, and the judge put a stay on the imposed discipline (the suspension), allowing TB to play until the matter is heard by the next level of appeal.I say it's thrown out...
Not exactly...the judgement did not address any facts of the incident, just the fairness of the process/investigation, and its adherence to the terms of the CBA. NFL has to appeal to get some power back. I'll be shocked if they don't. But the early read is that they won't seek to have the suspension reinstated during the long appeal process.Well ....it's over!
The NFL will appeal to save face (as if they have any left!) ..they've always had the power. I would do the same thing.
They should reduce it to just 1 game.![]()