mm1971
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 7,850
I'm obviously not talking about my 8 and ten year old. And yes my 2 and 4 year old would cry and if the people who chose not to move would have to deal with them. That would be their choice. And yes they tried to split us all up. That is not good business. And I have very well behaved kids and am complimented all the time about their behavior. Complimented numerous times on all those flights about how well behaved my kids are especially compared to most kids. And it's not exactly easy having to rush to our next flight when my ten and eight year old cant reach their carry ons so yes we made every one else behind them have to wait so we could get back to get them for them.
I'm trying to understand your point. While I get that you want to be together and I get that you have young children and I get that it's the airlines fault you can't sit together, what I don't get is the insisting that someone who may have paid a fee to board first and select their seat should have to give up that seat because you didn't pay to board early. If I pay to make sure my family gets to be together (old or young), why do I now have to sit away from them so you can sit together? We have 4 in our family. We usually sit 2 in front and 2 behind in one row, leaving an open seat in each row. Am I inconsiderate because my kids want to sit at the window and now someone that did not pay the early board fee has to be in two separate rows?
I guess I just don't get the why everyone is arguing. Most airlines, including SW, have a service that will pretty much guarantee you get to sit together. For SW, it's EBCI. If you choose not to purchase the service, you should not expect special treatment. And the cost of the service really isn't the issue. If I am willing to pay and you are not, then you should expect a different level of service.