WOW people are amazing! So, someone's WISH to sit next to the window or next to the aisle is MORE important than a parent sitting next to a 1 year old?!? And if the parent ISN'T able to sit next to the 1 year old because nobody will move because they are all so much more important, just who is going to be responsible for the 1 year old for the flight?? Why should someone with children pay more? Honestly, the question/issue here is that the airlines found ONE more way to impose an additional fee (optional fee, yes, but this is EXACTLY the kind of problem it causes). I can tell you all that I wouldn't let my EIGHT year old sit by herself on the plane, let alone my 5 year old. For one, it is simply not fair to the child (MY kids would not be comfortable with it, for sure). For two, the children would be subject to sitting next to GOD knows who, yes, freaks and druggies and molesters and such ride airplanes, too. And if you think that something "would never happen" on a plane, just ask all those people who have joined the mile high club on a packed plane.
No, people with families and children should not get more than they deserve. (I don't even understand where this anymosity toward children is coming from, it's utterly ridiculous - people with families are bullying and threatening??????) HOWEVER, parents sitting WITH their children I can hardly call more than they deserve.