Oh let me assure you BCB's school is not the only one that would not allow something that is not on the list to be offered regardless of occassion including B-Day.I don't really believe that your pediatrician considers a rice krispie treat to be healthy. I also don't believe that your kids' school refused to serve a birthday snack for that reason. I could see if they were homemade and those are not allowed. My school will not allow homemade food items. But they will allow store-bought cookies or donuts even though they prefer healthy snacks.
I don't really believe that your pediatrician considers a rice krispie treat to be healthy. I also don't believe that your kids' school refused to serve a birthday snack for that reason. I could see if they were homemade and those are not allowed. My school will not allow homemade food items. But they will allow store-bought cookies or donuts even though they prefer healthy snacks.
I think that rice krispie treats are certainly better than some items and OK for an occasional snack. I dislike the schools telling parents what their kids can eat.
Well, according to this http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/snacks/5639/2 site:
[Rice Krispie Treats are] "low in Saturated Fat, and very low in Cholesterol. It is also a good source of Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6 and Manganese, and a very good source of Thiamin."
OP, still wondering if the school every mentioned the policy before today? I mean it's June, wouldn't they have said something during the course of the school year? Or did they just say "healthy snacks allowed" and you decided that rice krispie treats qualified?
Where is it you think the government gets their money from? I think WE still pay for our healthcare and we pay a lot it is far from "free". What is next we are told what we can eat inside our homes too?
What is "high on sugar"......anything I have read/seen on tv on that lately suggests that is ridiculous.
As for unhealthy snacks at school... a treat once in a while is fine with me and I would never have an issue with the odd time someone sending in a treat- homemade is fine too and so far allowed at our school.
Sorry Tiger, I have to disagree with this statement. OUR very high taxes pay for OUR health care system.
When our government outlaws smoking because we all pay for smokers to have their lung diseases treated or people who can't control themselves with the sweets, salt or the other million things that might kill us all then they can tell me my kid can't eat rice crispy treats.
As for the treats in school I don't think a little 2" piece of RCT would kill the kids. The key thing there is birthday treat...I don't want some yummy birthday veggies with dip and kids don't either.
Sorry your child could not share their treats OP.
Well, considering the fact that our government pays for our healthcare costs, they absolutely have the right to do this.
Just heard the figures for how much obesity and diabetes, two diet related diseases, cost our country in healthcare, and the amount is in the billions.
Schools have taken out physical activity over the years, but they are slowly putting it back in, and so diet is next. As a teacher, I have to tell you, that teaching kids who are high on sugar all day is not easy. Unhealthy snacks and foods does not equal good brain energy. We implemented a breakfast program at our school with healthy foods, and you can't believe the positive progress and improvements we have seen in our kids, especially the ADHD kids.
Don't want this thread to be hijacked, but I just wanted to clarify this based on my response, as our schools have been dealing with this for the past few years.
Tiger
Your country perhaps but not mine and mine does not have the right to dictate what I eat, how much of it I eat etc.
I pay big bucks for my healthcare coverage and I assume a large portion of out of pocket costs that my insurance does not pay as well. In a way I as an insurance contributor also pays for people with unhealthy habits but what we eat is our business not the governments.
I don't want this to turn into a health tax debate, but our very high taxes don't begin to cover health care costs in general. You throw in diet related illnesses, and we are not covering the bills.
Diet related illnesses are things that can be controlled by the person putting things into their bodies such as processed foods, fats, sodium and sugar, so that is where the government has to go in order to curb the costs of those illnesses.
Interesting to see what schools will and won't allow in terms of snacks. But as I already said, I do agree that it's absolutely hypocritical to sell or give away those snacks.
I started and maintained our school store for years, which made my school thousands of dollars. We are an alternative school with no parent club, so we need that money, but due to new government regulations, we cannot operate anymore, as board of health kicks in when you start selling fruits, veggies and sandwiches, so our cooking department has taken that over.
I know more about the new government regulations than necessary, but that's because we had to figure out if we could make a go of it, and we cannot. They orginally had no selling of chocolate milk on the list, which was my biggest seller, but they have since added that back on, due to many groups protesting about that. Incidentally, Rice Krispie treats are on the do not sell list.
Interesting thread, Tiger![]()
There is a difference in bringing something in your personal lunch to eat and bringing it for the whole class. Just because you think rice krispy treats are okay doesn't mean everyone else does. I don't think there is anything wrong with a school having a list of acceptable treats; if they do, parents need to abide by it.
OP, did you MAKE the rice krispy treats? Your post said you cut them into 2 inch squares, so I am thinking they were homemade. If they were, that would knock them out as a snack option for my school. Everything has to be store bought and unopened with the ingredients printed on the label(sanitation and allergy related).
As far as the lunch choices at schools, I agree they are sometimes junk. The school has no real say-so in that, as the district sets the menu. Making them healthier would be nice, but unfortunately, school lunch programs are already in the red, and I sure wouldn't want other areas cut to pay for more healthy food. Parents can send a lunch in if they have problems with what they serve.