MindyLuvsMickey
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2006
- Messages
- 1,469
I agree with California Baby. Just so you know, because I had an awful time finding it, it's not with the other sun screens at Target. Its in the baby aisle.
FYI The EWG is an extreme organization who lobbies against ANY man-made chemicals. If you are also against this then the website is a wonderful resource. If you are not then the website is not that helpful because they will not recommend any product (including safe ones) that have any of these chemicals. They are also against vitamin A and any sunblock over spf 50. If you have sensitive skin it can be helpful.
I would choose something that's easy to apply and has broad spectrum protection of spf 50. I like regular lotion type from Aveeno but others like the spray. If you don't like the product you buy you are less likely to reapply. Reapplication time is very important and where most people are lax and in turn get sun damage.
Most of the name brands from Walmart or other mass retailers, Coppertone, Neutrogena, etc., are not good. They are filled with chemicals, and some of them, despite saying broad spectrum, actually don't do a good job of blocking harmful rays.
. . .
You want to stick with Blue Lizard, California Baby, Loving Naturals or Badger, as these use titanium dioxide, so it's mineral based. Goes on a bit thicker, but this way, you can see where it goes, and it covers well.
Weird how EWG actually recommends quite a few sunscreens, all of which contain chemicals, if they're so extreme and so against "ANY man-made" chemicals.
In fact, making such a statement that flies in the face the facts sounds rather... extreme.
I think people here can choose to inform themselves without someone launching uninformed attacks against the groups that are providing some of the information.
Where do you get those kind of sunscreens up in Canada, or do you buy them in the US?
I stocked up about 2 yrs ago on Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic as they offered coupons and were under $5 a bottle. I tried to get the bottles with the longest expiry date. I have bottles that are still good.
I just ordered a bottle of Blue Lizard )and I'm waiting to try it out. My daughter has extrememly sensitive skin and we're very limited in what we can use on her. We've tried California Baby and Badger along with a couple other mineral sunscreens and I just can't stand the feel of them (not to mention that Badger definitely stains clothing and still gave her a rash). I've been spending a lot of time on EWG's website tryng to find a sunscreen that is effective and reasonably safe that I can handle the way it feels. I'm hoping that Blue Lizard will be the one for us. I've also heard good things about Dr. T's Supergoop and KINeSYS. Neither of them is chemical free, but they're rated much better by EWG than most chemical based sunscreens. We may have to try those if the Blue Lizard doesn't do it for us. Good Luck!
Here are the EWG links to a couple that I mentioned (the lower the rating the better)
Blue Lizard - both the sensitive and baby versions have a rating of 2 on EWG...other formulas have higher rating
http://breakingnews.ewg.org/2011sun...lue_Lizard_Baby_Australian_Suncream,_SPF_30+/
Dr. T's Supergoop
http://breakingnews.ewg.org/2011sun...39/Doctor_T's_Supergoop!_Everyday_UV,_SPF_30/
KINeSYS - some of their formulas have a higher rating but this one is pretty low at a 3
http://breakingnews.ewg.org/2011sun...een_with_Parsol_1789,_Fragrance_Free,_SPF_30/
Well yes, that's rather the point of a chemical lotion sunscreen - and titanium dioxide is also a chemical (even though it acts as a physical sunscreen).Titanium dioxide also potentially has issues, along with zinc oxide, due to the fact that it's in the form of nano particles and may be absorbed by the skin rather than just sit on top of it (from what I've read though people with sensitive skin generally do better with zinc oxide than titanium dioxide). Anecdotally, I've found that zinc oxide doesn't sting my eyes, while sunscreens containing titanium dioxide do.
I agree about the broad spectrum thing - which is why we have a UVA star rating system over here, in addition to UVB ratings. The FDA licensed it for use in the US back in 2007 I believe but it hasn't taken effect for some reason.
I would recommend not bothering with anything above SPF 50 - I don't go over SPF 30 (and 5 star UVA) myself - because the increase in chemicals does not result in a linear increase in protection:
SPF 15 only lets through 1/15 of UVB (it blocks ~93.3%)
SPF 30 only lets through 1/30 of UVB (it blocks ~96.7%)
SPF 50 only lets through 1/50 of UVB (it blocks ~98.0%)
SPF 70 only lets through 1/70 of UVS (it blocks ~98.6%)
I didn't say they don't recommend chemicals just not made man ones. The only chemicals they recommend are zinc and titanium. I am not attacking anyone and actually said that the website is helpful if you believe the man made chemicals are harmful. I just think that everyone should know they are a lobbying group and what their beliefs are. No big deal clam down I am not attacking you.
If I'm not mistaken, the OP simply asked for recommendations for good sunscreens to use, not a background into political lobbying groups. Its sunscreen. If you have a particular brand you like, by all means recommend it. I have actually been jotting down a few of these to try on our upcoming trip to FLA. My daughter has sensitive skin and the Neutrogena SPF 100 has worked well for her and us.
If I'm not mistaken, the OP simply asked for recommendations for good sunscreens to use, not a background into political lobbying groups. Its sunscreen. If you have a particular brand you like, by all means recommend it. I have actually been jotting down a few of these to try on our upcoming trip to FLA. My daughter has sensitive skin and the Neutrogena SPF 100 has worked well for her and us.
If I'm not mistaken, the OP simply asked for recommendations for good sunscreens to use, not a background into political lobbying groups. Its sunscreen. If you have a particular brand you like, by all means recommend it. I have actually been jotting down a few of these to try on our upcoming trip to FLA. My daughter has sensitive skin and the Neutrogena SPF 100 has worked well for her and us.