So what you're saying is that the school should provide the opportunities to work in a community setting, and that the community service should take place during school hours.
yes bicker, if the school is going to require student to volunteer (or perform community service if you prefer) thats what I'm saying.
I'm not sure how getting some of the cost of instruction covered by the community instead of coming out of my taxes is a bad thing.
Well, if this going to be a requirement for graduating under the guise of "teaching the value of community involvement, or charity work, or yada yada yada" then the funding for things like transportation, and whatever "education" they are receiving from the students being forced to perform community service should be coming from the tax money set aside for education.
That has already been shown to be a red-herring. No one would be required to volunteer. Students would be required to perform community service - not volunteer.
Oh, sorry, forced to do community service. Call it what you want, it means the same.
Their own time is time not spent on required activities. Students taking chorus, band, drama, etc. - for credit - are often absolutely required to attend evening recitals and performances. There is long and strong precedent.
But what you failed to mention is that students taking band, orchestra, chorus, drama are doing so by choice. They choose one of those things to fulfill their "music" credit, and therefore they choose to attend after school hour events. Or, they could take a general music class and not have to attend anything after school hours and still meet the requirements for graduation.