I always get a tree company in to assess the situation, we have to pay for a permit to remove healthy trees on our property.
Sounds like it probably needs to be removed... BUT... we recently hired an Arborist to come out and look at our two trees in our backyard. He was with the Ag campus of the state university that's in our city. Anyway, for a small fee he was able to assess how healthy and stable our trees were and give us his recommendations on the concerns we had. Might be worth it if you're wanting an expert opinion.
So are they on city property or your property but on the easement?
In our city the tree upkeep and replacement should the tree need it due to disease or death is our responsibility when it's on our property.
That's similar to ours, the easement is technically our property and yet not. The utility companies for instance have rights to that area and can do as they please. In fact the neighbor next to us is having huge sections of his sidewalk replaced as we speak due to utility upgrades for the new homes across the street. When Google Fiber was being installed none of us had a choice because it's an easement and boy it was annoying for how it messed up our grass. It is the city's responsibility in our area to repair and replace sidewalks, they were out pouring concrete on Saturday and I assume they will continue this week for the neighbor's new portions of the sidewalk. But I understand what you're talking about as far as trying to pin down a reimbursement and just not worrying about it in the end.I had to look up easement definition. Excuse my ignorance, but I still don’t think I know the answer. I think that is considered city property.
City will replace sidewalks if rated bad but good luck with that. We had a reply already. Would not have happened anytime soon even though we had a high rating
We could have been reimbursed- but were told good luck with that so we did not bother
I just took picture from inside
Gosh that sounds frustrating, I know cities around here do trim people's trees that line the sidewalks but they don't prohibit them from doing it themselves and they still consider the tree the homeowner's ultimate responsibility, they just take it upon themselves to go around every so many years to brush things up a bit. That doesn't sound like a good policy for your city to have, I get not wanting trees to be ripped out but at least let the homeowners take care of them.Most homes with same property size have one tree. My house has two. Across the street, they took down trees and replanted (about 15/16 years ago). They also have two (unusual). Their property is a little bigger than ours - not much.
Correct, we can't touch them. In the past, a private tree cutting company was cutting down a tree and we asked them if they would trim ours (we would pay them of course). They said, no we can't touch them. I was constantly afraid someone would trip/fall and sue us so we re did it again.
Gosh that sounds frustrating, I know cities around here do trim people's trees that line the sidewalks but they don't prohibit them from doing it themselves and they still consider the tree the homeowner's ultimate responsibility, they just take it upon themselves to go around every so many years to brush things up a bit. That doesn't sound like a good policy for your city to have, I get not wanting trees to be ripped out but at least let the homeowners take care of them.