majortom said:
According to AAA, restaurants do not need to have a dress code at all to achieve five diamond status. It does need to have valet parking and a waiting area separate from its bar.
I was speaking generally. Most 5 Diamond restaurants do have a dress code of at least "jacket required," but you're right in that the Diamond rating is about the restaurant and not about what the restaurant requires of its patrons. I would tend to link a dress code with high-quality linen tablecloths and silver-plated utensils (some of the more specific requirements of a 5 Diamond rating). Always being referred to by name is another tiny detail that I have noticed at V&A. Attention to every detail is really what the AAA award is about.
majortom said:
I eat in fancy restaurants quite often, just do not like those that have dress codes. Based on your descriptions, I have no doubt that it is the best meal at WDW (although based on some of my more recent experiences, that is not such a high bar these days).
I guess I don't mind the jacket dress code. I think places requiring a tie are a little excessive. I feel out of place if the server is dressed more formally than I am
majortom said:
Have you ever been to Bayona in New Orleans? How about the Kitchen Table at Emeril's (New Orleans, Orlando or Las Vegas)? You seem to have a good range of experience, so I am curious both about your opinion of those and any comparison between them and Victoria and Albert's.
Never been to New Orleans, but I'm even more ready to go now and give them lots of tourist dollars. I've eaten at the Kitchen Table at Emeril's Delmonico's in Las Vegas (in addition to Picasso and Aqua-now known as Michael Mina). Picasso was very unimpressive. I try not to rate a restaurant on one bad meal, but it was not at all what it should have been. I also thought Le Bernardin in NYC was overrated. Some of the courses were exquisite, but others were sorely lacking. Not consistent and not worth the expense. Aqua was devine - probably the best seafood tasting menu I've ever had. Put Le Bernardin to shame.
Emeril's Kitchen Table was an incredible experience, although the star of the night had to be the Parmesan-Truffle-Garlic potato chips. I think the staff was more relaxed and interactive than at the V&A Chef's Table. Of course, they were younger than the Chef/Sommelier/Server at V&A. That could very easily be the difference. Our server at the CT was a little like Albert the butler from the Batman mythos. The Emeril's crowd was a bit more playful and hipper. As far as food, I'd give a slight edge in taste to V&A (mostly due to complexity of dishes), and a definite edge in both plating and creativity to V&A (if you want me to go all Iron Chef on you

).
Now, there are many high-end restaurants in NYC that I haven't tried. There comes a point when the price is just so extreme that I honestly don't think it's worth it (unless I have a lot of money to blow at the time or if it's a VERY special occasion). It's hard to justify a meal at some of those places when I think about how I could be eating multiple times at Babbo or Craft. Daniel is probably the next biggie I really want to try. I usually test a high-end place with a lunch or brunch. If that knocks my socks off, I feel fairly safe that it can only get better with dinner. That was the case with Jean Georges. After a tremendous Mother's Day brunch, I was more than willing to try dinner there.
Part of the reason Jean Georges, Alan Wong's, and V&A are my favorites is because I've eaten at all of them more than once, and my enjoyment has only increased with each successive meal. There are many great places I've been to once, but I'd need to try them again to check consistency. Although the service is excellent at each, the food at those three always leaves me moaning in joy.
V&A is definitely worth at least one try. And if you have the DDE card, it's also included in the 20% discount! Not the CT, but the main dining room is. We'll be saving over $500 with that card on our trip next week!