While I believe that Schapelle is innocent, I understand that I can't prove it. But what I do see all over this case is reasonable doubt. Another important thing to keep in mind is that a guilty verdict in Indonesia is not the same as a guilty verdict in western countries. The systems are very different and Indonesia does not require the same burden of proof as we know it.
1) Schapelle has had no known connection with drugs or has any kind of police record.
2) Her family was cleared by QLD police of any connection to drug traffickers.
3) In order for her to be guilty, she would have had to place a pillow-case size clear platic bag filled with mj placed on top in an unlocked bag with her name on it through Brisbane International, Sydney Domestic, and Sydney Internation airport security without it being notice.
4) The bag of mj was also slashed which means the odor would have been obvious.
5) The bag was completely out of her control for around 12 hours and handled by several others.
6) Upon the discovery of the drugs, none of her companions bags were checked.
7) No weights were compared to those in Brisbane.
8) The immigration officer that found the drugs claimed that Schapelle said the drugs were hers, yet at the trial could not speak a word of English.
9) Formal requests to have the bag fingerprinted were denied by Indonesia.
10) Formal requests to have the mj DNA tested for origin were denied by Indonesia.
11) The drugs were contaminated by Indonesian officials including the presiding judge.
12) The judge bragged about never finding an accused drug trafficker innocent in over 500 trials, before the trial even began.
13) There was no investigation in Indonesia as to how or where she was going to alledgedly sell the drugs.
14) If the drugs came from Australia, then a crime was committed there as well. So why were there no raids by the AFP?
15) Why in a post 9/11 world was there no CCTV footage at any of the airports?
You may be able to hypothecially pick apart some of these, but as a whole? No way. Seems like everyone BUT Schapelle is acting suspicious.
1) Schapelle has had no known connection with drugs or has any kind of police record.
2) Her family was cleared by QLD police of any connection to drug traffickers.
3) In order for her to be guilty, she would have had to place a pillow-case size clear platic bag filled with mj placed on top in an unlocked bag with her name on it through Brisbane International, Sydney Domestic, and Sydney Internation airport security without it being notice.
4) The bag of mj was also slashed which means the odor would have been obvious.
5) The bag was completely out of her control for around 12 hours and handled by several others.
6) Upon the discovery of the drugs, none of her companions bags were checked.
7) No weights were compared to those in Brisbane.
8) The immigration officer that found the drugs claimed that Schapelle said the drugs were hers, yet at the trial could not speak a word of English.
9) Formal requests to have the bag fingerprinted were denied by Indonesia.
10) Formal requests to have the mj DNA tested for origin were denied by Indonesia.
11) The drugs were contaminated by Indonesian officials including the presiding judge.
12) The judge bragged about never finding an accused drug trafficker innocent in over 500 trials, before the trial even began.
13) There was no investigation in Indonesia as to how or where she was going to alledgedly sell the drugs.
14) If the drugs came from Australia, then a crime was committed there as well. So why were there no raids by the AFP?
15) Why in a post 9/11 world was there no CCTV footage at any of the airports?
You may be able to hypothecially pick apart some of these, but as a whole? No way. Seems like everyone BUT Schapelle is acting suspicious.
I agree with the post that says who knows what the truth is???
