taeja71 said:This thread is dedicated to the opinions of those who DO NOT agree with the Steelers victory.
robinb Pretty snarky. What ever happend to being a good winner?
BTW, I didn't care which team won.

taeja71 said:That's the great part of DISing freedom, I can do what I want.![]()
taeja71 said:
obviously you do, or else you woldn't be posting!
I am tired of seeing ANTI STEELERS posts on the "Let's go Steelers" thread. Its fine if anti posts are left on the S.B. thread, but c'mon. Posting anti's on the other thread c'mon. So, I thought I'd create this thread for those who clearly DO NOT agree with the STEELERS victory.
That's the great part of DISing freedom, I can do what I want.![]()

WIcruizer said:Maybe Seahawk fans should be more concerned with Jeremy Stevens hands...
taeja71 said:
obviously you do, or else you woldn't be posting!
taeja71 said:That's the great part of DISing freedom, I can do what I want.![]()
.taeja71 said:I guess I should rename this thread....Bashing the Steelers fan. Very appropriate, b/c that's what's been happening.
ScoJo15 said:Other than the two false start penalties at the beginning of the game, how many flags were thrown on Pitt?
ScoJo15 said:I'm not a Seahawks fan, but the officials definitely handed the game to the Steelers.
Pass Interference in the end zone? No Way....they robbed Seattle of 7 pts.
Roethlisberger got the ball across the goal line? No way....they gave Pitt 7 pts.
Holding penalty on the throw that would have put Seattle on the 1 yard line? no way.
At least one bad call got reversed....by then it was too late.
Other than the two false start penalties at the beginning of the game, how many flags were thrown on Pitt? That's right..... ZERO.
I agree that Seattle blew some huge chances but I hate seeing a game ruined by poor officiating. Heck, Pitt almost was a victim of this against Indy.

you started this thread cuz you didnt wanna hear people say pitt got helptaeja71 said:I guess I should rename this thread....Bashing the Steelers fan. Very appropriate, b/c that's what's been happening.
No, the worst call had to be unnecessary roughness on Hasselbeck for "blocking below the waist" when he tackled the guy after the interception. It didn't have near the impact of some of the other ones - including the phantom holding call on the previous play - but it was an unbelievably bad call.cardaway said:The worst non-call was the pass to Ward near the goal line. Not only was there two very obvious holding calls missed to allow Ben to scramble, there was more shoving before the catch than Jackson ever did.
Jimbo said:No, the worst call had to be unnecessary roughness on Hasselbeck for "blocking below the waist" when he tackled the guy after the interception. It didn't have near the impact of some of the other ones - including the phantom holding call on the previous play - but it was an unbelievably bad call.
Some of the others were (questionable) judgment calls, but this one almost seemed like it was invented.

