wildernessDad
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2006
- Messages
- 5,090
I really hope your wrong about DVC at the GF as I think the better bet would be DVC at the Poly from a financial standpoint as I believe they would sell like hotcakes.
There are two different issues here.
The first issue is Disney's ability to make money building new DVC and selling "memberships" in those resorts. All indications are that this has been very good business for Disney. Not only do the points sell for far more than the cost of building a resort, but Disney is building a huge group of guests who visit WDW year after year. It makes sense that Disney will keep building new DVC resorts at WDW as other DVC resorts at WDW get close to selling out.
The other issue is Disney's ability to rent out DVC rooms to the general public when DVC members turn in their points for Disney Collection, Adventurer Collection, and Concierge Collection. At a time when demand is soft at WDW and Disney needs to resort to promotions to rent out all types of WDW rooms, DVC rooms are not immune.
I realize the issue. I guess my point was that if CRO has too many DVC rooms to rent out (hence the discounts) that must indicate that DVCers are using their points outside of WDW DVC properties--is that correct?
And the DCL limits indicate more DVCers trading out to use points for a cruise. This doesn't affect selling new memberships, but maybe shows that demand for DVC hotels at WDW by current members is down.
I think DVC at the Grand Floridian will happen but I am not sure they will convert any exisiting rooms as they did at AKL.
AKL, from the day it opened had a hard time keeping all those rooms occupied. That is not the case at the Grand Floridian.
I can't see Disney resort giving up valuable rooms that stay booked to DVC. But who knows stranger things have happened.
I agree. I'm one of the few who would rent the current cabins on points in a heartbeat if they were included with DVC.
Speculating: If DVC is considering such an addition they'd have to come up with a whole new design apart from the cabins (and copying the treehouses wouldn't work as they're all larger villas). The current units are not set up to DVC standards - they have more amenities than a studio (kitchen, 2 double beds and a set of bunkbeds as well as a couch) but they're lacking when compared to even a 1br unit (missing the jacuzzi tub, washer, drier and ... I want to say dishwasher) New cabins would need to be constructed either on a slab foundation or with double wide trailers. I doubt DVC would go with trailers since most members plan on owning for 50 years and the longest I've ever seen a trailer hold up to the elements and rodents has been 38.
I wonder if DVC could create cabins and include them in with VWL much as they did with the additions to SSR. Would it drive up the value of the existing VWL memberships?
I largely disagree and IMO, that's partly the reason that VB and HH were not as successful as anticipated, they relied on WDW to sell those resorts. Obviously it has to be a component but my opinion is that any new resort has to have enough appeal to sell on it's own. However, I think DVC has to take a more aggressive sales approach to be successful with off sites.If DVC is serious about expanding outside of WDW (Hawaii, possibly DC area, etc) they MUST have enough DVC rooms available at WDW to compensate for those off site locations. One of the main reasons to buy DVC is to stay at WDW....imagine if the people who buy points at off site can never get into WDW resorts, the complaints and reputation would take a huge hit. It is one thing not to be able to get your desired resort at 7 months, but imagine if you can't get ANY resort, including OKW/SSR at 7 months.....![]()
Check with one of the Bus Drivers . . .
God forbid you ever cross the campers. Trust me, I know.
What happened to the deadly bacteria that was supposed to infect the ground are water in that area? That was the reason they closed RC in the first place. All of the RC features are still there....just roped off with signs that say it's dangerous water quality. When we did the Wilderness Seque tour, they told how all that came about, and that it was why the infrastructure was still there undesturbed. They were trying to solve the bacterial issue. Evidently it infected the sand and everything. They even had the sandy beach area baracaded off with "unsafe" signs.
I think a Westworld style resort would be interesting, sans gunslinger, of course.![]()
I still say Grand Floridian is first. Though, maybe they can't figure out how to make limited service mousekeeping attractive to the high end guest?
This would surprise me as there are other plots that just seem more likely.
I seriously doubt housekeeping is the thing keeping them from building at GF.
Would I like to see one there? Yes. Will it happen? Extremely doubtful.
I seriously doubt housekeeping is the thing keeping them from building at GF.
The GF is Disney's flagship resort. My opinion is that Disney would have to be hard pressed to ever associate it with DVC.
Would I like to see one there? Yes. Will it happen? Extremely doubtful.
Disney would absolutely want to find a way to lock in the theoretical "high society / high spender" group into something committed like DVC. However, that's also the group that would balk at something like lack of mousekeeping (which was just an example, not meant to be "the reason it hasn't happened"). I don't think DVC caters to the 5-star hotel person very well. Yes the villas are nice with more ammenities than your standard room, but not 5-star service nice.