Rumor: Disney shutting down rental brokers

Oddly enough, the contract actually defines a gap between renters of the room via a DVC member, and gifted occupants of the room (and I'm assuming that the rez for a honeymoon would be a "gift" not a "rental"). But it would be very very hard for Disney to enforce in any way, as you reference.



At the end of the day, the nonmember who is renting is not "reserving a room." The OWNER is reserving a room. And it would be very hard for Disney to define who is a renter and who is not, and renting and letting others stay on your points is expressly permitted by contract. It would be very difficult for Disney to change that part of the contract. It's not a section with any clauses with wiggle room.

Couldn't Disney ask the guest to show their DVC membership at check in? I would think a member who is gifting use of their points wouldn't mind handing them their DVC membership card but would likely not do so for a stranger that is buying the use of their reservation. I don't have an answer to how this would be done. Maybe only allow renters for the 7 month reservations. It was just an outsider's observation that I shouldn't be able to enjoy a DVC room that I rent from someone if there is a DVC owner who wanted to stay at the same time and couldn't. Some think it doesn't matter because the owner's points are used. I look at more from the point of who is actually using the facilities.
 
Contractually, it doesn't matter. Doesn't matter what "some" think.
I understand this allowed in the contract. I won't buy DVC because it just seems easier to reserve a room when I want and not have to worry about the 11 month, 7 months, banking points, renting points, use year, walking reservations, etc. I know it works well for others based on what I read here.
 
Great post but I do think that SSR not specifically, but generally DVC growth has had an impact.

As DVC grows, near park resorts during special times have higher competition at 7 months. That in turn, puts pressure on "buy where you want to stay".

Owners that years ago had more freedom at 7 months, because of the competition of growing points at that window, are now buying where they want to stay.

Once you buy where you want to stay, you can't be ignorant of the 11 month pressures. It's self-feeding.

Because of more demand at 7 months, more owners are buying specifically for the 11 month window and once you buy for that window, demand yields to the high priority times.

As a result, probably MOST of the BCV and BWV resale contracts are now going to owners looking to capitalize on the 11 month window. As DVC owners well know, that's for F&W and early Dec. There's an amplification effect of more owners specifically owning to book in those specific hard to get windows.

Indeed, this is EXACTLY why we say, buy where you want to stay.
I agree. As a recent BWV resale owner (closed about a year ago) we specifically bought there because of the low point cost rooms avail at a near park resort. We love being able to walk to Epcot (and DHS). We did take advantage of the 11 month window at 8 am eexactly 11 months this year to secure a standard view studio for our F&W trip. Having been educated by researching DVC here we knew the importance of booking early. I think these days people buying resale of the 2042 expiration resorts are mainly purchasing for the home resort advantage ESPECIALLY at busy times since they are not the most cost efficient. Plus once an owner gets shut out they will book earlier next time.
 

Something that never seems to come up on these forums is the fact that many DVC members use their points to cruise, trade out especially to Adventures by Disney. As Brian said, I just think more members are using their membership than before, either booking for their self, renting, or trading out.

As others said SSR has no effect until 7 months.
 
When SSR opened, I did a number of posts on the idea of a balanced system - one in which the number of rooms at a resort and its desirability worked out to be a fairly balanced equation. You wouldn't ever get perfect, but Disney could have done a lot better. They didn't create a system with really any intent to balance it though - and SSR coming on the heels of BCV is the point where it goes from "yeah, the system is off kilter" to "people are really going to have to have a different set of expectations." BCV is a very small resort with lots of special appeal - SAB, Walk to Two Parks, Integrated with Deluxe Hotel, Easy to Get to Dining with Several Options - probably a few others. Plus, in comparison to Poly or GFV points - or even BLT points - low point cost. SSR is a very large resort which doesn't have a lot of specialty features - its close to Disney Springs, but they dropped fireworks and closed the Adventurers Club - two of the draws for owners. It has slightly lower points, but isn't the bargain that OKW is.

That isn't SSRs fault, or rather, its a systemic issue that has to do with supply and demand across all the resorts.

The renting issue can also be traced back to Disney - its a value to rent points compared to getting an on site Deluxe hotel room. Not surprisingly, renters are drawn to the DVCs attached to Deluxe resorts. If Disney wants to stop renting, they could sell hotel rooms cheaper and run more promotions. DVC owners who rent have a hard time competing with - oh, say free tickets with stay promotion. While it continues to be a great value to rent points, people will rent points and owners will rent them out.
 
When SSR opened, I did a number of posts on the idea of a balanced system - one in which the number of rooms at a resort and its desirability worked out to be a fairly balanced equation. You wouldn't ever get perfect, but Disney could have done a lot better. They didn't create a system with really any intent to balance it though - and SSR coming on the heels of BCV is the point where it goes from "yeah, the system is off kilter" to "people are really going to have to have a different set of expectations." BCV is a very small resort with lots of special appeal - SAB, Walk to Two Parks, Integrated with Deluxe Hotel, Easy to Get to Dining with Several Options - probably a few others. Plus, in comparison to Poly or GFV points - or even BLT points - low point cost. SSR is a very large resort which doesn't have a lot of specialty features - its close to Disney Springs, but they dropped fireworks and closed the Adventurers Club - two of the draws for owners. It has slightly lower points, but isn't the bargain that OKW is.

That isn't SSRs fault, or rather, its a systemic issue that has to do with supply and demand across all the resorts.

The renting issue can also be traced back to Disney - its a value to rent points compared to getting an on site Deluxe hotel room. Not surprisingly, renters are drawn to the DVCs attached to Deluxe resorts. If Disney wants to stop renting, they could sell hotel rooms cheaper and run more promotions. DVC owners who rent have a hard time competing with - oh, say free tickets with stay promotion. While it continues to be a great value to rent points, people will rent points and owners will rent them out.

I still don't see how this has any effect on anything except 7 month bookings.
 
IMO bookings are more difficult for at least 3 reasons. SSR, travel in general being increased and that owners are more informed in general than before. SSR is not the only points looking at 7 months but IMO it is the main portion related to DVC points and has been the big change. This is true because it's a very large resort and for on property, it's the lowest demand resort thus both a higher % and total points looking at 7 months out. HH, and possibly VB but be higher but they are smaller resorts and were in place when the economy was good before and things were much easier to book. AKV might also be discussed in this light as well. IMO that affect stretches all the way to the 11 month window because of incremental affects starting at the 7 month window. Is this a problem, well it is in a sense but it's the way the system works and IMO, more choices are always better thus I'm not complaining just stating. Remember that those that own at higher demand resorts won't change if they can't get what they want at 7 months, usually at other high demand resorts. Thus they are in a sense trading to other resorts within their own trading group with some leakage to the lower demand resorts. New DVC resorts will only help this issue if, and only if, their inherent demand is higher than the average. It likely takes 100 high demand villas to equal one SSR villa related this issue.

All those points being sold for the POLY bungalows and the new VWLII bungalows are just going to continue this problem if enough DVC members don't end up wanting to book there.
 
I think the thing is that when people say that SSR makes booking other resorts at 11 months more difficult, that's just... not really? There may be some effect of more people booking their home resort at 11 months then not changing, but I doubt it's hugely significant. The expectation that you can get any room at any resort at 7 months was never the system's intent, and if anyone has had that expectation it's not the system's fault or the fault of rental brokers or even the fault of the large number of "non-premium" points from AKV and SSR.
I agree it's the system. IMO SSR has been the single largest change ever related to the 7 month reservations, as I mentioned, affecting all resorts back to the 11 month window other than things so limited that even minute one 11 months out they might not be available. Here's how. Those that were waiting until at or after 7 months out to reserve (and there were/are those) are now going to be shut out when they weren't before. Now they move back to ahead of the 7 month window which affects other owners and it marches back to the 11 month window. It really doesn't require much of a change to have the affects I've described. I personally feel DVC had unexpected later availability for years and that where we are now is more like I would have expected from early on. For the record, I'm not complaining, just stating.
 
Lots of good points as to difficulties in booking at certain times. To me the smaller contracts that people have added on especially at BWV for Food and Wine would make it difficult to book standard studios. As far as BWV, for years we had difficulty based on when we were going.

Maybe it is just me but when we first joined, we would never stay in a studio with kids, that is why we bought in the first place to spread out and really enjoy a "vacation home". I think the demand for the type of accommodations may have changed. From our personal experience, with our kids grown, we now use studios instead of 1 or 2 BR which means we stay on property more days taking up more inventory. We might be the exception but I would imagine over the past 5, 10, 15, 20 years this trend has grown. Add to that Poly, and VGF owners who have learned that they can stay at other resorts for fewer points further increasing demand.

But don't worry with the stock market being shaky, a Presidential election that may scare even more people, the economy may take a turn and lower demand. :rolleyes:
 
Lots of good points as to difficulties in booking at certain times. To me the smaller contracts that people have added on especially at BWV for Food and Wine would make it difficult to book standard studios. As far as BWV, for years we had difficulty based on when we were going.

Maybe it is just me but when we first joined, we would never stay in a studio with kids, that is why we bought in the first place to spread out and really enjoy a "vacation home". I think the demand for the type of accommodations may have changed. From our personal experience, with our kids grown, we now use studios instead of 1 or 2 BR which means we stay on property more days taking up more inventory. We might be the exception but I would imagine over the past 5, 10, 15, 20 years this trend has grown. Add to that Poly, and VGF owners who have learned that they can stay at other resorts for fewer points further increasing demand.

But don't worry with the stock market being shaky, a Presidential election that may scare even more people, the economy may take a turn and lower demand. :rolleyes:

I definitely think the demand for studios has increased. It would be interesting to know if studios are the most heavily rented accommodation. Many people renting have a budget close to what a moderate costs. Very few one bedrooms and definitely not two bedrooms are going to come close to that amount for a renter.

Also as you said, those that bought early on, are now 25 years older and possibly empty nesters that would rather book a studio and save points and go more often. Also those that have bought fewer points recently due to cost are also probably looking for studios.
 
I'm not saying this is a good idea, as being able to rent out our points in the event that we couldn't use or bank our points was a selling point for us, but I have a friend who has timeshare points at another company and they charge him a fee to book a reservation that he's not on. He's got more points than he can use due to buying a resale contract for pennies on the dollar so he offers them to friends and co-workers all the time, with the caveat that they have to pay the booking fee and dues percentage. It's still a good deal for who is using the points, and he's not profiting from it, but they also aren't going to waste.

I had originally heard of this through a private Disney group on Facebook that I'm part of with a few friends, however there was no link to an article or other source that gave it any validity. I came here because I assumed that if such a rumor was going around that it would be spoken of here as well. She said that she got her information from a broker who wasn't allowing bookings past August due to the changes. Another person in the group echoed what many others have said, that a broker simply got him in contact with the renter and the member had to book the reservation himself and wasn't sure if Disney had any real way of knowing that the broker was involved.

Time will tell I guess if any of this comes to pass.
 
The $95 booking fee is for ancillary benefits that are not deeded. It would be harder (though not impossible) to add it for regular bookings.

Agree. The current $95 fee for trading out of DVC most likely goes to Disney / CRO as an administrative expense. Since the non-DVC "collections" are not part of the timeshare contract, Disney can effectively do whatever it wishes there and members are in a "take it or leave it" position.

If DVC were to implement some sort of booking fee for the 13 DVC resorts, any fees collected there would offset program operating expenses and lower annual dues. The DVC timeshare system operates as a non-profit. Revenue collected via booking fees would mean corresponding reduction in some dues expense category--perhaps "Administration and Front Desk."

Under such a system, owners who made a lot of short-stay reservations would probably end up paying more than an owner who made just one reservation every year or every-other-year. But I doubt it's worth the hassle and negative PR associated with such a move. Even owners who benefitted from the change--the infrequent bookers--would be skeptical.

Same is essentially true of resort parking fees. DVC dues fund the maintenance and upkeep on resort parking lots. I don't see how Disney could legally implement any sort of parking fees without either removing that component from our dues or using the parking revenues as an offset. Charging members to maintain the lots and then charging again to use the lots is double-dipping.
 
All those points being sold for the POLY bungalows and the new VWLII bungalows are just going to continue this problem if enough DVC members don't end up wanting to book there.

We could go 10 years without any point reallocations at the Poly and it won't stop anyone from throwing arrows at the Bungalows.

That said, I doubt that the Bungalows are proving to be the sort of negative influence that many speculate. While they aren't consistently booking up before the 7 month window, the same is true of most resorts' Grand Villas which fall in the same price range.

There are currently 15 Bungalows in the timeshare association (and only a fraction of those points sold to Poly owners.) For March '16 there are 12 nights on which all bungalows are booked. For April, 9 nights. We cannot tell how many rooms are vacant on nights when availability remains, but it's reasonable to assume that availability is limited--I doubt occupancy swings from 15 bungalows filled one night to just 2 or 3 later the same week. It's probably more like 12, 13, 14 bungalows booked on nights when availability remains.

In the fall of 2015 during Food & Wine Fest and all of the other Halloween / Christmas happenings, Bungalow occupancy was even higher.

The bungalows are far out of my price range, as are grand villas. But they represent 20 rooms out of 3500+ two bedroom equivalent villas at WDW. It doesn't take a large percentage of owners wishing to stay in the bungalows for them to fill.

The main reason the Bungalows seem to be drawing attention is their limited occupancy. Nobody questions the existence of Grand villas which are similarly priced, while accommodating 3 more guests. Do we really think the only reason people book Grand Villas is because they have 10-12 people in their party? While some undoubtedly put larger groups in GVs, they've always struck me as prestige accommodations...just like the bungalows.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying this is a good idea, as being able to rent out our points in the event that we couldn't use or bank our points was a selling point for us, but I have a friend who has timeshare points at another company and they charge him a fee to book a reservation that he's not on. He's got more points than he can use due to buying a resale contract for pennies on the dollar so he offers them to friends and co-workers all the time, with the caveat that they have to pay the booking fee and dues percentage. It's still a good deal for who is using the points, and he's not profiting from it, but they also aren't going to waste.

I had originally heard of this through a private Disney group on Facebook that I'm part of with a few friends, however there was no link to an article or other source that gave it any validity. I came here because I assumed that if such a rumor was going around that it would be spoken of here as well. She said that she got her information from a broker who wasn't allowing bookings past August due to the changes. Another person in the group echoed what many others have said, that a broker simply got him in contact with the renter and the member had to book the reservation himself and wasn't sure if Disney had any real way of knowing that the broker was involved.

Time will tell I guess if any of this comes to pass.

Unless the broker is using his own points, the member would have to make the reservation in any case. I don't get why August would make a difference, if there was a new rule I don't think Disney could make it retroactive to existing reservations.
 
We should have a contest on which topics are discussed the most in the DVC forums. If such a list existed, topics related to "renting" and "walking" would certainly rank near the top, along with perks and housekeeping. :duck:

I'm just sayin'
"Why doesn't DVC get free dining?"
 
This is due to reservations being made during busy seasons and then being canceled.

That's not being done by brokers. That's just owners. There are very few brokers who offer cancellation...

But every one of those changes is a case of "be careful what you wish for." They would negatively impact both renters AND the far greater number of owners simply looking to use their points.

Absolutely.

It is not uncommon at all to be shut out especially for the less expensive rooms.

Yep. Fellow owners want those rooms as badly as we do!

then, there's the issue of revenue paid to the broker for their services, which seems contradictory to the no profit thing as to selling points expressed by DVC.

What no profit thing?

Other than people becoming more savvy as to booking, I can think of no other factors in play

The advent of online booking.

If DVC rentals decreased would Disney room reservations increase? How many points were forfeited each year prior to rental brokers? How much money does Disney lose when DVC owners stay home instead of vacationing at Disney? Can Disney come up with their own program to allow owners to transfer points to Disney at a reduced rate if they did take steps to stop other renting?

:earsboy: Bill

Let it be noted that Bill is giving Disney ideas here. :)

People renting points via a broker are also generally not going to walk reservations, or wait list them. If

Exactly.

I'm not a DVC owner and never rented points. From my view as an outsider, it seems somewhat unfair to DVC members if they can't reserve a room when they want while a non-member can simply because they rent from an owner who books and then never uses the reservation. DVC members should have priority over non-members, IMHO.

As an owner (er, the associate who is the one in charge of the DVC account entirely and who is typing this from AKV on a SOLO trip without the owner), I don't care about that at all. It's all owners. The owner of the points I'm using is driving home from Seattle right now. Should I not get to use these points just b/c he's being Worker Bee?

And at what point does the priority stop? Are owners, who are swearing that THEY are going to be there, knocking out people who aren't owners up until checkin? That's not OK.

If the "member" gets priority, what happens when I want to make a honeymoon reservation for my son and his bride? Do they get "member" status or are they treated like a renter?

Your post came right after Crisi talking about giving her daughter a DVC honeymoon. If your son and Crisi's daughter get married, they'll get one heck of a sweet honeymoon DVC stay! :)

At the end of the day, the nonmember who is renting is not "reserving a room." The OWNER is reserving a room.

Exactly.

How about a $95 convince fee, a resort parking fee or some other fee for non-members. Disney added the $95 booking fee and didn't say a word, apparently that's legal.

:earsboy: Bill

Stop blowing holes in my ship! Er. Stop giving them more evil ideas.

key card the laundry room to your member card

Intriguing, but then they would just have to build another laundry room. Because it would seriously not be cool to not have laundry facilities for people without access to a membership card.

My point was anybody, including a member who owns at a different resort, can use a broker to garner the 11 month window if they are willing to pay a premium to purchase the points. in turn, not a stretch for them to then 'sell' their points to a broker or save them for an additional trip another time.

OK so you're talking about the SSR owner renting a reservation for one person, and renting a reservation for themselves. That got lost in there somewhere.

A friend who has recently bought resale @ SSR has told me she is doing exactly whatt i described for a trip next year. Broker she rented thru before buying in, indicates that they have great success rates. Said she read the strategy on another message board. I don't advocate it and sure wouldn't go thru the time and effort. was surprised to hear of it, but I also was when I first read the hint as to walking a reservation here.

Anyone could do this on their own, no broker needed.


What about guest certificates for non-member reservations? DVC could require those. If the member isn't on the reservation, you need a guest certificate. And then they must attend a required sales event. That would shut just about anything down. But as brokers compete for points from members, the price to rent goes up. It goes up too much and guests will just book moderate resorts and save money. Plus be able to cancel or change their reservation.

Hopefully you would include Associate as someone not required to have those things. Not that I know what a "guest certificate" is.

and it's way too loud to bring her to a game.

I knew where you lived before I even checked, based on that. :) And good for you. It's loud enough just for the summer amazon picnics. A few years back they had a kid's group (The Not-Its) playing at the 50 yard line and it was unbearably loud. A kid's band!

Not all brokers. There is at least one that allows the renter to purchase cancellation/change insurance and they try to change the reservation if they can.

So then the reservation is getting rebooked, which means the cancellation doesn't persist.

On the other hand I have noticed that we could often grab SSR even during busy time periods a few months out...perhaps it does all balance out in the end in some fashion.

Yep, exactly. We never even booked our home resort until I stayed there this last weekend for Princess; so those primo points at BL were being used for other resorts since '09 by us. It all balances out.

I have told our guide that we don't plan on adding on again because of the issue of booking studios where we want to stay after the 7 month window.

That's a fellow owner issue, though...

I too think the brokers are not what Disney intended with the renting privilege, and that should be shut off somehow.

Disney knows that businesses pop up to help people immediately.

Shutting it down would just cause points to go unused, really.

Couldn't Disney ask the guest to show their DVC membership at check in?

How does that work for me? I'm an Associate. No membership card. The owner's wife isn't alowed to use the points unless hubby is here?

Believe it or not, that's not actually why we bought DVC, to make it all all-members-of-the-family trips... It's our "home", our timeshare, and we bought it to use how we want to use it. DH works and can't always be here.

I understand this allowed in the contract. I won't buy DVC because it just seems easier to reserve a room when I want and not have to worry about the 11 month, 7 months, banking points, renting points, use year, walking reservations, etc. I know it works well for others based on what I read here.

Well, if you ever rent a DVC room through normal WDW routes, you've participated in DVC stuff. :)

The brokers just match an owner with a renter. Not unlike the disboards.

Exactly. So the Dis would likely have to stop. And then people would just have to find people IRL to use their points, which can't always be done, and then Disney would have a lot of unused points out there.

Huh. Wonder if that's what they want?

Under such a system, owners who made a lot of short-stay reservations would probably end up paying more than an owner who made just one reservation every year or every-other-year.

Didn't we buy a timeshare like this to use *how we want to use it*??? Let's take rundisney. Princess weekend, I booked a 3 night stay. I'm still thinking about coming out for another race or two this year; that would be another short stay or two. I would look like an evil renter to you, wouldn't I? But the owner's family is using those points.


Unless the broker is using his own points, the member would have to make the reservation in any case.

And of course that's still the owner. :)
 
R
All those points being sold for the POLY bungalows and the new VWLII bungalows are just going to continue this problem if enough DVC members don't end up wanting to book there.

This is my thoughts exactly! We own VGF and there are already complaints of not being able to book studios at 11mo.. DVC sales pitched were focused mostly on people useing their points for the studios.. (Poly sales pitched is focused the same way) A LOT of VGF owners bought just enough points for the studios during the time of year they wanted. Which has led to a good bulk of VGF owners being shut out at 11mo..


Now following the same idea that members should be treated better then non-memebrs
Then why should disney be allowed to rent out DVC rooms for cash???

My story:
I badly wanted to take a last min trip in jan.. I called twice a day and check every resort/ for every kind of room at 60 days out.. And nothing but a day hear or there.. (Wanted a week)
Finally My mother was able to trade her timeshare at RCI to get us a room at SSR at 25days out.. (Couldn't use my DVC points to book room) :confused3:confused3
Fast forward 2 days before our trip the airline calls me and wants to move out flight to the day before.. (Bad storm)
I call DVC... Of crouse nothing.. Couldn't even give a good cash deal at a non DVC resort..
I Ended up paying FULL price to stay at Coronado springs for one night.

Was I upset I couldn't use my points or that other NON-members were useing the rooms..
NOPE! Not one bit.. When I boughted into DVC I knew exactly what I could get, might get, and what may happen once in a blue moon.. (Thanks to all those on the purchasing DVC boards) :cool1:

It's not the brokers, renters, or other members faults if people are shut out 11mo./7mo.
Members need to do their research and know what they may or may not be able to get..
And keep expectations in check
 
Last edited:




New Posts














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top