I also think about all of the little children who lost one - or both - of their parents that day.. And the babies born after that never were held by their daddies..![]()
Yesterday marked the unveiling of the first major 9/11 memorial containing the names of some of the young victims mentioned here.
Each of the five children who were aboard American Flight 175 -- David Brandhorst, Dana Falkenberg, Zoe Falkenberg, Bernard Brown, Asia Cotton and Rodney Dickens -- has their name inscribed on a individual bench at the new Pentagon 9/11 memorial.
The site lists the age of each victim and arranges the benches from youngest to oldest, so David Brandhorst and Dana Falkenberg are the first names that visitors see.
I can only imagine how striking it for many of them to be immediately confronted with the fact the victims on that doomed plane included three year olds.
![]()
Perhaps you could edit the above post..the information seems to be incorrect...flight 175 went into the WTC and 77 into the pentagon
All of the above was stated correctly at the beginning of this thread - when I added the update this morning I untentionally mixed up one of the passengers on United 175, listing him as being on American 77.
To correct things, the murdered children on American 77 who have benches at the Pentagon don't include David Brandhorst. He was on United 175, which hit the south tower in New York.
As for plans for David to be listed in a formal major memorial in New York, while that will be wonderful, given how slowly things are moving there it maybe decades before that happens. Originally, the 9/11 memorial there was supposed to be open by the tenth anniversary in 2011. Just last week, the Port Authority of New York stated there is no way the memorial will be finished by then -- and in fact offered no new timetable.
Bottom line: the armwrestle between greed and bureaucracy that has hamstrung the building of a 9/11 memorial in NYC is not only mind-boggling, but unconscionable - and likely has every radical Muslim fundamentalist on earth cheering.![]()
The WTC is an extremely large site and will take a long time to rebuild...
those lost will be properly memorialized with a permanent site.....
and I for one would prefer it be done properly and in due time... I hope it is sooner rather than later...but it sends no signals to fundamentalists... in either case..
NYC is my backyard and the reaction of new yorkers and americans to the terror of that day sent a clear message about the substance of our people to those who hate us.....
I fully appreciate the complexity of the WTC rebuild and the intent wasn't to politicize. It was more commentary on contemporary culture.
I'm saying that because "politicizing" would imply there's an opposition universe out there of people who think everything surrounding the development of the NYC 9/11 memorial is being perfectly managed and is right on track.
That's a complete fantasy - no one is happy with the slow, pained progress of the project (albeit the Port Authority of NYC is in the unfortunate position of having to make repeated excuses for it). I travel frequently to NYC and have close friends there. None of those locals are happy at all with how the process relative to the memorial has been or is being managed. Not one.
And I can understand why - they have now for seven long years faced a sad tale of squabbling stakeholders all pushing for the dominance of their particular agenda. The concerns of those involved appear to be less in "doing it patiently and right" and more in maximizing leaseholder profits, pacifying various lobbies (as example one being the "first responders," a group that seems to think the memorial needs to primarly be their private shrine), etc., etc.
9/11 as a crisis showed NYC at it's absolute best - courageous, aligned and resilient. It is sad that the next chapter -- the re-construction of the WTC and the building of the memorial -- which could have been a second "Manhattan Project" -- is going down in history instead as a plodding period marred by lack of accountability and petty competing fiefdoms.
Commentary: Seven years after 9/11, why no memorial?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/mcgovern.groundzero/index.html
New York's 9/11 memorial plagued by delays
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-memorialsep11,0,4561393.story
On this sad anniversary, this is one old thread that needs to be re-opened. There are some things we just must never forget, such as these children.
![]()
Thank you for bumping this old thread.
11 years later and I still get goosebumps and the tears just flow.
So sad to think that those 11 year olds would be 22 now.... maybe in college... maybe married... so horribly sad![]()