JWhiz
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2017
- Messages
- 108
The news about Copper Creek has gotten me excited and thinking about adding some points to my DVC membership. I am a relatively new member, and haven't even taken my first trip yet. But I have a 100 point contract purchased resale for Animal Kingdom Villas (AKV). I purchased after the latest changes to benefits, so I have the most limited of benefits via resale.
Background: I purchased at AKV because I liked that you "owned" both at Kidani and Jambo, because it is the only DVC with club rooms, and personally I love the resort. Given the purchase was a bit crazy as I haven't annually visited WDW since I'm on the west coast, I settled on purchasing a place that I would be proud to own. It helped that financially it was one of the best values in resale with its low buy-in cost per point and long contract life, which help balance out the relatively high annual dues compared to some others.
Potential New Purchase: Given that my heart won out somewhat over my head with the original purchase, if I buy-in direct from DVC this time, I want it to be a bit more strategic of a purchase. By purchasing a 25 point contract direct, I am hopeful I can get exactly what I want (resort and use year) while getting access to the benefits I currently don't have, even though I will pay a premium price to do so. At least direct I should be able to get exactly what I want instead of hoping to find a small contract resale which will be harder to track down, and not as much savings anyway as the smaller contracts have higher prices per point.
Four Potential Options: Bay Lake Tower, BoardWalk Villas, Villas at Grand Californian, Copper Creek Villas
BLT -- Even though I haven't stayed here, I really love the resort. Location on the monorail close to MK is big. I love the style of the rooms. The price point because of the current low annual dues and long contract life are a selling point as well. But it also seems like a place that is not necessarily hard to book at seven months, so maybe it's not the best strategic purchase.
BWV -- Now we are getting warmer. I love the location between DHS and Epcot, and love the resort, even though I'm not crazy about the rooms. This resort definitely seems more difficult to get into than BLT, even though it has a large quantity of rooms. Or is the difficulty only really during Food & Wine? Shorter contract life doesn't make this the best financial value even though the annual costs are pretty much in the mid-range of all DVC properties.
VGC -- On the surface, this one seems to make the most sense. A resort I would likely never consider in resale due to high buy-in cost per point becomes more attractive when I'm paying direct prices which makes the buy-in the same for all potential choices. It is the most difficult to get a reservation in at any time of the year at seven month, so the home resort would probably be most advantageous here. The other wrinkle is that I'm a resident of Southern California at the moment living 15 miles from the Happiest Place, so why the heck would I need a very pricey resort room? I am likely relocating in the next couple of years, but it's not 100%. So is there some risk that makes this not as smart as it may look on paper? Probably. The number of rooms at VGC are so small compared to any other DVC resorts, that it's likely always going to be difficult to book here. The high number of points per room is also a concern particularly with a small contract. It might be difficult to even stay three days with banking and borrowing.
CCV -- The one that sparked all these thoughts. Other than it being new and having a relatively small number of rooms, there isn't much particularly advantageous. Hard to know how difficult it will be to book here. I like the new rooms more than those at BRV at least "on screen." If VWL has been one resort like AKV instead of two, it probably would have been more incentive to buy here for me. The location is great, though less so than a monorail resort obviously. I'm not sure how disappointed I will be with the temporary lack of trees as the resort has to develop again after all the construction. I probably don't have the same passion for this as the other three, but perhaps there is something that makes this one the most sense that I'm not totally seeing at the moment.
Anyway, so there you have it. What do you think? What makes sense? What would you do? I'm open to alternatives too, but the ones above are predominantly what I would be interested in. Though I would certainly stay at other resorts too, I'm not sure their attraction or advantages are enough for me to consider something else.
Thanks for your thoughts!
Background: I purchased at AKV because I liked that you "owned" both at Kidani and Jambo, because it is the only DVC with club rooms, and personally I love the resort. Given the purchase was a bit crazy as I haven't annually visited WDW since I'm on the west coast, I settled on purchasing a place that I would be proud to own. It helped that financially it was one of the best values in resale with its low buy-in cost per point and long contract life, which help balance out the relatively high annual dues compared to some others.
Potential New Purchase: Given that my heart won out somewhat over my head with the original purchase, if I buy-in direct from DVC this time, I want it to be a bit more strategic of a purchase. By purchasing a 25 point contract direct, I am hopeful I can get exactly what I want (resort and use year) while getting access to the benefits I currently don't have, even though I will pay a premium price to do so. At least direct I should be able to get exactly what I want instead of hoping to find a small contract resale which will be harder to track down, and not as much savings anyway as the smaller contracts have higher prices per point.
Four Potential Options: Bay Lake Tower, BoardWalk Villas, Villas at Grand Californian, Copper Creek Villas
BLT -- Even though I haven't stayed here, I really love the resort. Location on the monorail close to MK is big. I love the style of the rooms. The price point because of the current low annual dues and long contract life are a selling point as well. But it also seems like a place that is not necessarily hard to book at seven months, so maybe it's not the best strategic purchase.
BWV -- Now we are getting warmer. I love the location between DHS and Epcot, and love the resort, even though I'm not crazy about the rooms. This resort definitely seems more difficult to get into than BLT, even though it has a large quantity of rooms. Or is the difficulty only really during Food & Wine? Shorter contract life doesn't make this the best financial value even though the annual costs are pretty much in the mid-range of all DVC properties.
VGC -- On the surface, this one seems to make the most sense. A resort I would likely never consider in resale due to high buy-in cost per point becomes more attractive when I'm paying direct prices which makes the buy-in the same for all potential choices. It is the most difficult to get a reservation in at any time of the year at seven month, so the home resort would probably be most advantageous here. The other wrinkle is that I'm a resident of Southern California at the moment living 15 miles from the Happiest Place, so why the heck would I need a very pricey resort room? I am likely relocating in the next couple of years, but it's not 100%. So is there some risk that makes this not as smart as it may look on paper? Probably. The number of rooms at VGC are so small compared to any other DVC resorts, that it's likely always going to be difficult to book here. The high number of points per room is also a concern particularly with a small contract. It might be difficult to even stay three days with banking and borrowing.
CCV -- The one that sparked all these thoughts. Other than it being new and having a relatively small number of rooms, there isn't much particularly advantageous. Hard to know how difficult it will be to book here. I like the new rooms more than those at BRV at least "on screen." If VWL has been one resort like AKV instead of two, it probably would have been more incentive to buy here for me. The location is great, though less so than a monorail resort obviously. I'm not sure how disappointed I will be with the temporary lack of trees as the resort has to develop again after all the construction. I probably don't have the same passion for this as the other three, but perhaps there is something that makes this one the most sense that I'm not totally seeing at the moment.
Anyway, so there you have it. What do you think? What makes sense? What would you do? I'm open to alternatives too, but the ones above are predominantly what I would be interested in. Though I would certainly stay at other resorts too, I'm not sure their attraction or advantages are enough for me to consider something else.
Thanks for your thoughts!