LittleMissMagic
Victoria on Vacation
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,705
Absolutely filing a police report is traumatic, the whole process from the invasive rape kit, giving your statement again and again, to having to go to court is not something someone would want to do.
But many of these cases are not going to the police, they are dealing with campus justice. And the ball can start rolling and be hard to stop once they say something.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a33751/occidental-justice-case/
https://reason.com/2019/08/01/carleton-college-title-ix-expelled-football-student-lawsuit/
https://reason.com/2017/01/31/amherst-student-expelled-for-sexual-misc/
I don't think this situation is what the "targeting" article that the OP posted was about, but it does raise concern. There are a lot of things going on here.... underage drinking and underage people (the Jane in the Esquire article is 17 - even if she was sober to give consent, she couldn't). Bad judgement all around.
Maybe "false reports" or "questionable drunken consent reports" wouldn't be as common if the victim was not allowed to purse action from the school without having filed a police report. Or maybe the universities should start being proactive and monitor student drinking and university-affiliated events.
HMMM.... pretty tricky.
We cannot be telling girls it is okay to get blackout drunk. They don't deserve to be raped of course, but we should be teaching and expecting healthy drinking habits. The safety risks are of many things other than sexual assault.
And also because we do many things to protect ourselves from harm everyday, why should protecting yourself from assault by limiting how much you drink not be one of them?
And lastly while being blackout drunk is not asking for it, they do bear some responsibility when they don't know if they did actually ask for it or not. Particularly when the evidence suggests she did.
Girls cannot rely on someone else being in a state to recognize the fact that they are not in a state to consent.
In an (understanable) effort to protect victims from being further traumatized by the process, campuses have completely disregared the accused rights to a defense and the system as it now is arguably sexist.
Okay, but let's flip it and reverse it - we cannot be telling boys that it's okay to get blackout drunk and rape women. Why not protect yourself from rape charges by limiting how much you drink? Or not having sex with totally blacked out girls?
It is sexist. And don't guys sometimes wake up embarrassed of the totally trashed girl they slept with when they were blacked out the night before? If they were also drunk, they didn't consent. Why don't they take it to the school board?
*Editing to say that I see both sides. This isn't black-and-white (the drunken consentual-or-not sex.... not rape). I hope that none of your sons get expelled from school for drunkenly having sex with a girl who later decided to report him to the school board. And I hope that none of your daughters wake up in a stranger's bedroom and don't remember having sex the night before. It sucks for both parties. But I still believe that these are not common occurrences. The probability of this will happen to your kid is very low. So, sure, worry - but not any more than you worry that your kid will get in a car crash, fail out of college, get a DUI, contract an STD..... the list goes on.
Last edited:
Daughters and sons - I heartily agree.