Aliceacc
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
OK, taking a step back...
At this point in time, my kids are all old enough to sit alone. If I were ASKED to switch seats so that a family with kids could sit together, I would do so. I have no medical issues that make one seat preferable to another. I'm 5'4" and petite, so I'm OK with the middle seat.. heck, that's the one I'm taking for our trip to WDW in a few weeks so the kids can have the window and my husband can have the aisle. I'm generally a pretty accommodating person. So, sure, I would give up my seat.
We've all been there. Things happen. Sometimes you've done everything right-- booked assigned seats, planned a trip to avoid cranky time, dotted your i's and crossed your t's... and still things happen.
That's absolutely not my point though.
My stand on this is that you only have a right to "demand"--- though that's only the route I would choose after all the polite options had been exhausted-- what you've paid for, and from the person to whom you've paid it.
So the mom in the OP, had she paid for adjoining seats, after having explained and requested and explained again, might find herself rightly demanding that the airline give her the adjoining seats she had paid for.
She had no right, under any circumstances, to demand that any other passenger on that plane do anything for her.
Had she chosen NOT to pay for assigned seats, then her argument is far weaker. Airlines like Southwest-- not sure who else-- charge less. But they also choose not to offer the perk of letting you choose where or with whom you sit. All your ticket guarantees is that you'll have a seat.
This isn't about whether or not the other passengers chose to do her the favor she demanded of them. This is about her choice to demand a favor from the other passengers for a perk she chose not to pay for. Or her choice to play the sympathy card-- badly, ill mannerdly-- instead of being reasonable with the airline and working with them.
At this point in time, my kids are all old enough to sit alone. If I were ASKED to switch seats so that a family with kids could sit together, I would do so. I have no medical issues that make one seat preferable to another. I'm 5'4" and petite, so I'm OK with the middle seat.. heck, that's the one I'm taking for our trip to WDW in a few weeks so the kids can have the window and my husband can have the aisle. I'm generally a pretty accommodating person. So, sure, I would give up my seat.
We've all been there. Things happen. Sometimes you've done everything right-- booked assigned seats, planned a trip to avoid cranky time, dotted your i's and crossed your t's... and still things happen.
That's absolutely not my point though.
My stand on this is that you only have a right to "demand"--- though that's only the route I would choose after all the polite options had been exhausted-- what you've paid for, and from the person to whom you've paid it.
So the mom in the OP, had she paid for adjoining seats, after having explained and requested and explained again, might find herself rightly demanding that the airline give her the adjoining seats she had paid for.
She had no right, under any circumstances, to demand that any other passenger on that plane do anything for her.
Had she chosen NOT to pay for assigned seats, then her argument is far weaker. Airlines like Southwest-- not sure who else-- charge less. But they also choose not to offer the perk of letting you choose where or with whom you sit. All your ticket guarantees is that you'll have a seat.
This isn't about whether or not the other passengers chose to do her the favor she demanded of them. This is about her choice to demand a favor from the other passengers for a perk she chose not to pay for. Or her choice to play the sympathy card-- badly, ill mannerdly-- instead of being reasonable with the airline and working with them.
Last edited: