FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Messages
- 21,800
First, I am a guy...
I have watched the Ang Lee/Ema Thompson movie version of this Jane Austen novel at least two times with my wife, and we are currently watching the BBC miniseries. I have never read the book, or an I really interested in doing so because British Romanticism isn't my thing.
But I have a question for people who have read the book and/or watched the movie before and/or understand this type of stuff. I know I asked my wife this before, but I don't remember her answer.
Edward Ferrars was secretly engaged to Lucy Steele (but falls out of love with her because she's a golddigger). Edward's mother, Mrs. Ferrars, finds out about this engagement and cuts Edward out of the estate, making Edward's brother, Robert, the sole heir.
Lucy and Edward break off their engagement, and Lucy marries Robert, who is now the rich one.
So, then why does Robert not lose out on his father's estate for marrying Lucy?
I have watched the Ang Lee/Ema Thompson movie version of this Jane Austen novel at least two times with my wife, and we are currently watching the BBC miniseries. I have never read the book, or an I really interested in doing so because British Romanticism isn't my thing.
But I have a question for people who have read the book and/or watched the movie before and/or understand this type of stuff. I know I asked my wife this before, but I don't remember her answer.
Edward Ferrars was secretly engaged to Lucy Steele (but falls out of love with her because she's a golddigger). Edward's mother, Mrs. Ferrars, finds out about this engagement and cuts Edward out of the estate, making Edward's brother, Robert, the sole heir.
Lucy and Edward break off their engagement, and Lucy marries Robert, who is now the rich one.
So, then why does Robert not lose out on his father's estate for marrying Lucy?





