Lil' Grumpy
<font color=purple>Lil' Grumpy is really a Big Swe
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2006
- Messages
- 2,820
some very interesting comments.
now my current message would be for dvc management - i am
disappionted when i just read about an owner- out of points,
founding a business renting dvc rooms-on ebay..after trading
in from rci. ok? why is dvc management allowing this business
to set up shop, using rci memberships?
but this goes for the owners too.....as a group we should be
asking why wasn't this stopped before ? "who" is inside management
that is supposed to been monitoring & why isn't dvc personnel
demanding "rci" to end this person association? how did this
person feels so confident---and so bold? this goes back to
dvc personnel. and this goes a long way to explain some of
our encounters/situations.
"change" is the secret for finding new success. especially when one is
willing to learn from past mistakes. as for the "possibilities" for
increasing direct buyers , all one has to do is make a list. if i had control
over this system, there are 2 major criteria i would separate
my list for limiting resales vs direct -liked the vip comments
and /or "adding" features to the direct purchases. "adding" would
have priority, because i would think the goal must be to "manage"
resales not limit or take it away. does dvc internal mangers ever
"study" the different trends between the 2 groups? hint, that's
where i think they could find the best changes-for
both groups.
why isn't dvc in the resales game with the idea to build/protect
their future? ultimately, dvc properties belong to disney. unlike
other time-sales, the contacts expired. so dvc have no plans on
what to do? one would think this was already in place? i would
think there are certain price levels (based on what the
resort original sold for), that dvc would begin to reclaim the
resort and /or time left. and i would think the "plans" to
re-design the resort to draw new owners. "it's like"- what could
they do to studio rooms @ blt, if they reclaim whole sections.
over & over, hearing they are too small for 4. they could
expand the rooms even if that meant less future owners.
at other resorts, & the recent success @ aoa- they could
take the other resorts in that direction. i think they would have
little problems "selling" that.
maybe they don't have a clue, & those working dvc is just
filling in for a pay check? when we decided to buy in , it never
occurred to me that this was a system with no directions-
then i started seeing problems. liked our original guide was
out extended illness & they didn't pick this up. this wasn't the
guide fault. to me, a system failure.
now my current message would be for dvc management - i am
disappionted when i just read about an owner- out of points,
founding a business renting dvc rooms-on ebay..after trading
in from rci. ok? why is dvc management allowing this business
to set up shop, using rci memberships?
but this goes for the owners too.....as a group we should be
asking why wasn't this stopped before ? "who" is inside management
that is supposed to been monitoring & why isn't dvc personnel
demanding "rci" to end this person association? how did this
person feels so confident---and so bold? this goes back to
dvc personnel. and this goes a long way to explain some of
our encounters/situations.
"change" is the secret for finding new success. especially when one is
willing to learn from past mistakes. as for the "possibilities" for
increasing direct buyers , all one has to do is make a list. if i had control
over this system, there are 2 major criteria i would separate
my list for limiting resales vs direct -liked the vip comments
and /or "adding" features to the direct purchases. "adding" would
have priority, because i would think the goal must be to "manage"
resales not limit or take it away. does dvc internal mangers ever
"study" the different trends between the 2 groups? hint, that's
where i think they could find the best changes-for
both groups.
why isn't dvc in the resales game with the idea to build/protect
their future? ultimately, dvc properties belong to disney. unlike
other time-sales, the contacts expired. so dvc have no plans on
what to do? one would think this was already in place? i would
think there are certain price levels (based on what the
resort original sold for), that dvc would begin to reclaim the
resort and /or time left. and i would think the "plans" to
re-design the resort to draw new owners. "it's like"- what could
they do to studio rooms @ blt, if they reclaim whole sections.
over & over, hearing they are too small for 4. they could
expand the rooms even if that meant less future owners.
at other resorts, & the recent success @ aoa- they could
take the other resorts in that direction. i think they would have
little problems "selling" that.
maybe they don't have a clue, & those working dvc is just
filling in for a pay check? when we decided to buy in , it never
occurred to me that this was a system with no directions-
then i started seeing problems. liked our original guide was
out extended illness & they didn't pick this up. this wasn't the
guide fault. to me, a system failure.