Thanks for all the input. It really helps to hear everyone's opinion and I forgot about 2 fireworks shows!!
I probably should have mentioned that the cruises we are looking at are the Galveston to San Juan and San Juan to Port Canaveral. I am assuming there will be a ton of B2B cruisers for these cruises. The 6 night does not stop at Castaway-so we would only get 1 CC stop
...
Most Panama Canal cruises do hit a distant foreign port. I believe the 2015 one went to Cartegena, Columbia. That's a distant foreign port, so a Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston would be allowed. Although I believe I read that Disney was only allowing 2 B2B bookings and Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego wasn't allowed.You cannot do this "cruise" as you would be sailing from one US port to another US port without visiting a "Distant" foreign port. We checked with DCL on opening day and the person that answered the phone booked them for us, then we asked him to talk to a supervisor. And he returned with the correct answer - NO (so we cancelled). The same thing was true last year, you could not sail from Hawaii to Vancouver BC and continue on to San Diego (I don't think you could have done this even if you were continuing on through the panama canal to...?? where ever the PC cruise terminated??. The US government considered that traveling from Hawaii to San Diego. Stupid laws!!!
Therefor there won't be a ton of B2B cruises on these cruises, there will be "none" (the crew doesn't count).
I am assuming B2Bs have a duplication of things like port fees and such, but overall, is it a wash in terms of price? A 3-day + 4-day B2B on the Dream costs the same as a 7-day on the Fantasy?
For dates i have considered, i have always found that B2B on the Dream has been cheaper than 7 night on the Fantasy. I haven't booked one yet, but have checked the prices numerous times.
We have only done on B2B, but booked them before they changed their policy, so we did get the discount and OBC for both legs.The negative that would bother me in doing it again, is we would only get our OBB benefits on 1 of the cruises so it would likely be less expensive to do a 7 nights and get more of an OBC.
I'm not sure if there is already a thread similar to this question but we are considering our first back to back cruise on DCL and I am trying to think out the pros and cons of cruising back to back. If you have the same cabin for both cruises-do you always keep the same wait staff or does it vary? Having the kids club closed most of the first day and participating in double safety drills before sail away are some instant negatives that pop into my mind. Are there any perks besides possibly getting a better price on two shorter cruises than we would get on a longer cruise?
I though I had read the the Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston was NOT allowed because of the Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego part of the cruise. Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston should be OK, since the PC cruise does go to a 'distant' foreign port.Most Panama Canal cruises do hit a distant foreign port. I believe the 2015 one went to Cartegena, Columbia. That's a distant foreign port, so a Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston would be allowed. Although I believe I read that Disney was only allowing 2 B2B bookings and Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego wasn't allowed.
The way the PVSA is interpreted, they look at the embarkation port and the debarkation port. In the case of the B2B2B those would be Hawaii and Galveston. As long as a distant foreign port is visited during that cruise (the PVSA views it as one cruise, not 3), it's legal.I though I had read the the Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston was NOT allowed because of the Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego part of the cruise. Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston should be OK, since the PC cruise does go to a 'distant' foreign port.
Silly laws.
The way the PVSA is interpreted, they look at the embarkation port and the debarkation port. In the case of the B2B2B those would be Hawaii and Galveston. As long as a distant foreign port is visited during that cruise (the PVSA views it as one cruise, not 3), it's legal.
The issue was DCL had problems understanding the PVSA legalities, and they got a little gun-shy about what's allowed for those B2B cruises, and said (as far as I know) that the Hawaii/Vancouver/San Diego/Galveston B2Bs would not be allowed and therefore didn't let people book them.
Except that Hawaii/Van/SD also involves (as you describe it) "temporarily going ashore" since, in effect you must debark the ship in Vancouver. And, in the past, that's not been allowed due to the PVSA. Typically the "temporarily going ashore" doesn't mean just getting off the ship and back on, it means getting off the ship to stay for a short time - like overnight, or for a couple of days.I am not a lawyer, so I'll leave the interpretation up to Disney and the govt, but taking a quick look at the cbp.gov site it does not appear that it is just determined by embarkation/debarkation.
'Second, a non-coastwise-qualified vessel transports a passenger on a voyage solely to one or more coastwise ports and the passenger disembarks or goes ashore temporarily at a coastwise port. (19 CFR § 4.80a(b)(1)). For example, a non-coastwise-qualified vessel that embarks a passenger in Los Angeles and transports him/her to one or more of the Hawaiian Islands where he/she goes ashore temporarily and returns to Los Angeles where he/she disembarks, violates the PVSA"
This seems like it would apply when the passengers that travelled from Hawaii to Vancouver to San Diego would disembark temporarily before reboarding for the final leg to Galveston