Wick
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2002
- Messages
- 992
What specifically keeps me going back is the older "masterpieces" - they are so well done that I continue to learn about storytelling from them. I've have litterally been on Disneyland's 'Pirates' and 'Mansion' hundreds of times and I am still finding new insights into design, narrative and showmanship. In a lot of ways, a really, really good attraction can be studied in the same way a painting or a novel can be studied.
Of course, the flip side is true as well. Trying to figure out why a show like 'Mission: Space' fails can lead to just as much understanding as figuring out why 'Soaring' works. The sad thing is there's far too much "why didn't" instead of "why did" going on these days.
But I guess the biggest reason why a lot of the 3's and 4's keep around is that we've moved onto appreciating Disney more than we enjoy it. While we still like the shows and rides, we're much more intellectually interested in the "back stage" elements of the parks - the history, the motivations, the theories about whats goes on. Perhaps it happens when someone takes any hobby to the extreme, but really - what's the difference between knowing what year Disneyland's Submarine Voyage opened and the last time the Yankees had a left handed third baseman that batted .340?
Well said!