Lol, that would suit me just fine - I might be able to go twice
Seriously though, I cannot imagine that they would ever be allowed to discriminate like that! They would have no way of telling whether there are medical issues causing weight problems and some people are just naturally built heavier/lighter than the next person.
It would be nice if they gave you an extra luggage allowance if you were within a certain rangeas per Torsie's suggestion
But if the passenger pays for a seat and is happy to sit in that seat for an entire flight, it should be up to them, not the airline.
I've had to do it for helicopter flights (where weight really matters as it's a smllaer craft)How degrading for people to be asked to stand on scales! im not pooh sized but i would still be mortified watching the humiliation of someone being asked to get on scales! i can't see this actually happening!![]()
How degrading for people to be asked to stand on scales! im not pooh sized but i would still be mortified watching the humiliation of someone being asked to get on scales! i can't see this actually happening!![]()
Yeah, good luck to the airline who tried it first![]()
torsie24 said:I think it's a pretty good idea. Like if there was a total limit for person+baggage.
I agree that 75kg is very low!
That's 12 stone and most men are over that. DH is 6'4" and slim and still over 13st.
That's why I said "most" and not "all" - you're almost 4 stone under "average"I'm a man (5'10 and 9 stone 4 (59 kilos)) so I'm well under that weight limit.
I think a total weight for a person and luggage would a fair system.
The ONS said the average man in England was 5ft 9in (175.3cm) tall and weighed 13.16 stone (83.6kg).
The average woman in England weighed 11 stone (70.2kg) and was 5ft 3in tall (161.6cm).
I think a total weight for a person and luggage would a fair system.