- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 45,575
I still say VGF to RR is apples to oranges. The only similarities is the " Fancy factor" and even that VGF is more ornate vs more classic decor at RR.
One is Epcot One is MK
One is a Hotel one is separate buildings
One is new one is legacy / older
for me Epcot vs MK made me ignore everthing else even though I liked VGF1 better
I don't think we get any useful data from the comparison.
I think where the resort is located is part of the decisions when choosing.
So, it’s a fair comparison in the sense that when given the choice between two nice resorts, restrictions are not enough to sway buyers away from choosing it when they have other reasons for wanting it.
Put another way, those that want an Epcot area resort are not going to pay more for VGF, even though it’s not in the area they want simply because it doesn’t have restrictions.
I have a feeling that it’d be the same for VGF if it had restrictions. People would buy it because they want an MK area.
It’s why I think Poly tower will have them and that DVD isn’t going to be that worried it won’t sell.