itchin2go
When life gives you lemons, make lemonade!
- Joined
- May 8, 2007
- Messages
- 3,375
Why would I have to play along?
I didn't ask for the person to approach me. They inserted themselves into my space uninvited to seek attention for themselves. It is not up to me to sooth their egos when I did not engage the interaction. Some of the givers here seem to think that they have the right to impose themselves on others and others absolutely have to play along.
I would try to be polite, but probably wouldn't be able to completely hide the vibe that I thought the person was a few fries short of a Happy Meal. It would be a short and curt "no thank you," along with turning my back on the person. I certainly would not "play along" as that would encourage the behavior.
And I am just as entitled to that reaction as somebody who gets mad when people rebuff their attention seeking behavior. If it was truly about distributing kindness and not about attention seeking, the giver would just skip away to their next mark.
You missed the next sentence of the person you quoted which said, "There are even ways to handle it if you want no parts of it."
Of course you're entitled to your reaction. The person you're arguing with didn't even dispute that.
This is not directed to anyone in particular, but it seems some just want to fight here, and poke fun at others.
I don't want glitter on me, and I, for one, would be taken aback if a stranger were to offer me or someone in my family a random gift. I, like many of you, would like no part of it. I *get* it.
However, all this stuff about how it's all about the giver seeking attention? What? Let's not fight just for the sake of fighting.