Those are stunning!
Great photos! Care to share your data on the photos so we know what mm you were shooting at??
You can right click on any of the photos to get the full exif, except for the ISO which does not show on Nikon pix, for some strange reason.
~YEKCIM
Hmmm...I never can get it when I right click....wonder why??
If your using IE you need to download a plug in to be able to do so.
Search on Opanda
Hmmm...I never can get it when I right click....wonder why??
Opanda works great. I use it with Internet Explorer. If you are using Firefox as your web browser, then go to the Firefox homepage and they have a plug in that you can use.
Yekcim,
Great pics! You are making me think Nikon... Man, all of you are gonna hate me by the time I finally decide and buy a DSLR aren't you!?
Andy
If your using IE you need to download a plug in to be able to do so.
Search on Opanda
Andy, you KNOW it is inevitable! Just go ahead and give in. It has taken me a while to get enough of the learning curve behind me to begin to get some shots I'm happy with, but comparing my D50 results to my Fuji S5200 shots, there is no doubt that it was the right move. And, that is more an endorsement of the D50 than an indictment of the S5200. For $250, the S5200 was a tremendous digital camera, and was an excellent "intro" into digital photography. The D50 is capable of so much more but, then again, it should be, given the cost differential. For the cost of *one* 70-300VR, I could have bought *two* S5200's!
~Ed
Well, Ed, I will remain in Canon's court for now. Shots like those above could certainly get me to jump ship and join the Nikon bandwagon for sure though!
Andy
Again, wonderful pics Ed. I love your zoo trips. Thanks for all your insight.
Well, I gotta tell you...I'm becoming very fond of the 70-300VR; I tend to shoot at the long end most of the time so it fits that tendency very nicely, and is a pretty sharp piece of glass to boot. I'm sure Canon has something equivalent, although I'm not "up" on their stuff. I just like shooting "long", personally, b/c it allows subject isolation, and some interesting space-compression perspectives that are not possible with shorter focal lengths. But that's just me.
~Ed
I agree. When I shot film with my Rebel, I was always at 300mm with my 75-300mm! I don't know what it is, but I like to have the subject very closely cropped in all my photos.
Andy