I'm looking to get a new lens for my 510. Right now, I'm looking at the 35mm F3.5 macro ($229) and the 50mm F2.0 macro ($499).
If I get the 35mm, will I wish that I had just waited and got the 50mm? I'm wanting to improve on portrait/people shots and in lower light. Any pros and cons with these two lens? I'd love to hear your opinions on these lenses or if you have them and how you use them--which would you choose?
Thanks!!
Hi!
I have an e-520 and an assortment of lenses (50 mm, 11-22, 14-42, 40-150, 50-200 Non-SWD and 70-300). I had the 35 mm but found that I REALLY disliked shooting with it. My DH on the other hand, who also has an e-520 LOVES it.
I tried the 35 as a portrait lens and found that I had to get to physically close to my subject for either of our likings. I bought it for its macro capabilities and found that I didn't enjoy using it, nor did I get good pics. I have the Oly ring flash and a nice tripod but they didn't seem to help.
As for the 50, I have used it both as a portrait lens and, on occasion, as a walk around and enjoyed it much more.
I found my 35 by doing a google search and looking for the best price. I got it brand new for somewhere around $125. The 50 came off of ebay pretty cheap too. You just have to keep your eyes peeled
.
The kit lenses are both useful and you can get amazing shots using those lenses and good technique. I second the advice to employ your external flash in your portrait work. I use a 50r and a Fong Lightsphere with the amber dome attached for shooting people portraits.
One important thing to know about me, lest my gear give the wrong impression, I am neither independantly wealthy, nor am I a "pro". But as an extremely dedicated amatuer, and a world class bargain hunter, i wanted to throw myself in on this one
.
I have enjoyed looking at the pics already shared andhope to add a few to the thread in the near future.
Take care all, help lots of people and have a "Wonder"ful day!
Tisza