And finally I grabbed a Sony ISO 4000 raw and a Fuji ISO 6400 raw and processed as guick and as good as I could to sharpen image and reduce noise while raising shadows 100%. The reason I choose 4000 for Sony and 6400 for Fuji as the exposures were equivalent. 100% crops
A7II ISO 4000
Fuji ISO 6400
Interesting comparison. If exposures were the same at 4000 to 6400, it suggests they are calculating ISO quite differently. But now I'm curious... if you downsized the A7 image so it was the same size as the Fuji..
To my eye, it is indeed very close. I dare say the Fuji looks a little better than the Sony in some areas, but I suspect if you downsized the Sony to make them equivalent, the A7 would look much better. But I could be completely wrong too.
So Phil, if you only kept one camera, would it be the A7II or Fuji? I love the Fuji for multiple reasons but am always pulled toward a FF for some reason.
Maybe I'm just crazy