Pet friendly????

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love my dog with all my heart. She is my baby. I take her everywhere possible. But I don't see any need for her to come to Disney with us. Why should she sit in a room all day long by herself possibly disturbing other hotel guests while we are off at the parks?

Unless you plan on spending a decent amount of time in your room (or rental house), I don't see how the dog would be comfortable in a tiny room for hours on end.

I also think it's pretty selfish too.. the pet would be there for your comfort and your own reasons not the pet's.... it's pretty boring in a hotel room all alone all day.
 
Sorry but I'm going to dissent as well. I have really bad allergies and I can detect if a cat was in a room. I carry and epi-pen for those allergies.
 
We took our dog a couple years back and kept her in the kennel and had a very good experience with that. With that being said we would NEVER travel again and take her with....just too much on her and us. Much easier getting services on the home end. And I can very much understand those that are against pets in rooms....we avoid it as much as possible when we travel.
 
I hope Disney stays with the no pet policy. My family is allergic to animals. I also don't want to hear a dog barking when I am trying to relax. Sorry to all who want their pets in the hotel room.
 

The trend -- especially at upper end hotels -- is pet friendly. WDW is absolutely behind the times.

Stay at the Universal Hotels -- they are nicer and better priced than Disney hotels -- and Fido is welcome.

The pet friendly hotel threads always bring out a bunch of posters with allergies and whatnot. But, the Loews hotels seem to do fine with their pet friendly policy. The W Hotels here in NYC permit pets (they even have doggy dishes with food and water at the hotel entrances).

We stayed recently at The Broadmoor, one of the truly spectacular resorts in the nation. They are pet friendly and it was great.

Many Marriott Residence Inns are pet friendly.

We often stay at the Doubletree at Dana Point in Southern California. We take our yorkie and it's great.

As, I said, WDW is most definitely behind the times!
 
I'll be the lone dissenter. I hate the thought of animals in the resorts. I have animals...3 cats and an 80 lb golden retriever. I love them to pieces. But I'm not taking them to WDW with me. And I certainly don't want to have to listen to someone else's pet whining or barking in the room/villa next to me. I have enough of that at home during the summer months.
I don't mean to sound uncaring or harsh, but...many people have allergies, or are afraid of animals. The resorts need to stay pet-free. I know this isn't going to be a popular stand but it is what it is.

I have 2 labs and a cat and about the only time I would take my dogs on vacation is if I go camping. I agree that I don't want to hear someone's dog in the next room. Just like kids, out of sight, out of mind. They have no concept of time and they will be thrilled when you get home but they will have no idea how long you've been gone.

I knew exactly what I got into when I became a pet owner and that is that they stay at home under the care of someone else when I choose to go on vacation. Yes, I miss them terribly, especially my kitty (he's always been my little baby) but if you accept the responsibilities of being a pet owner you need to realize that A) it is not your right for resorts/hotels to accommodate your pet and B) if you really don't want to leave pets at home don't go on vacation or go somewhere that they are welcome.

I'm not trying to be vicious but it's just a fact of life. Next thing you know, people are going to be asking to bring their goats, cows & horses!!! :rotfl:
 
The trend -- especially at upper end hotels -- is pet friendly. WDW is absolutely behind the times.

Stay at the Universal Hotels -- they are nicer and better priced than Disney hotels -- and Fido is welcome.

The pet friendly hotel threads always bring out a bunch of posters with allergies and whatnot. But, the Loews hotels seem to do fine with their pet friendly policy. The W Hotels here in NYC permit pets (they even have doggy dishes with food and water at the hotel entrances).

We stayed recently at The Broadmoor, one of the truly spectacular resorts in the nation. They are pet friendly and it was great.

Many Marriott Residence Inns are pet friendly.

We often stay at the Doubletree at Dana Point in Southern California. We take our yorkie and it's great.

As, I said, WDW is most definitely behind the times!

But the issue with Disney is that people leave their hotel rooms for long periods of time up to 14+ hours at a time. A dog cannot be left for that long. And why would you take your dog on vacation to leave it for 2/3 of the day?
 
People also leave their hotel rooms for long periods at Universal. Loews Hotels seem to manage just fine!
 
I miss my dog horribly when I travel and as much as I'd love to have him in my hotel at Disney, it woudn't be fair to him. I know he'd much rather be staying with my parents where he'd be spoiled rotten or at the pet resort at home (I'm lucky enough to work at an animal hospital with a luxury pet resort). Plus, though my dog isn't always a barker, I would be worried about him barking when he hears excited kids running in the hallways.

That being said, I don't think it'd be a horrible idea for Disney to offer a pet friendly resort. My only hesitation would be housekeeping. Pet smells are so hard to get rid of and there's also the issue of making sure everything is properly disinfected. Do we know if the pet friendly hotels require certain vaccinations and how they clean the rooms between little furry guests? And let's not even start talking about the flea problem...

I'm glad Disney is finally getting onboard with a pet resort. I think it's a fantastic option for pet owners who have reservations about boarding their pets in traditional kennels. I think it's going to be wildly popular! I can't wait to see it!
 
It would be a great option to have. Those who prefer not to vacation with pets or have allergies could choose to stay elsewhere. It certainly couldn't hurt to make the option available to people. Many other hotels have found a way to accommodate travel with pets and it would be great if Disney could to.
 
http://allears.net/tp/kennels.htm

I'm reposting the link. It's about kennels, folks. Fifi and Fido aren't going to be staying at POP or the Yacht Club. :laughing:

For folks who enjoy pet friendly hotels, those are available offsite. :thumbsup2
I prefer Disney stay pet free.:cool1:
 
I am going with the no pet crowd. DS is extremely allergic to cats where exposure can put him in the emergency room (allergic asthma). The dander left behind in the room would be enough to set off his allergies. It's not something that can be "cleaned away" easily. Animal dander can live in upholstery and carpet for a long time, despite cleaning.

I know those who have never experienced allergies may not take it very seriously and see it as people whining or over reacting, but dander allergies are not something to be taken lightly.
 
As, I said, WDW is most definitely behind the times!

And I hope they stay behind if that's what being current is. I have a hard enough time with environmental allergies but those are nothing compared to my pet allergies!
 
Another vote to keep WDW pet free for many reasons. But the thought of being the next guest after a St. Bernard puppy has stayed in the room for a week before me would not be appealing to me. I had a Newfoundland and at 1 year he weighed about 150 pounds and his poops were about 3 pounds each. Where is all that going to go? He also drooled when excited (which in a hotel room would be pretty much the entire time), and Mousekeeping would be crazy to walk into a room with him in there. He shed horribly and flung drool on the ceiling. I loved him and I wouldn't want to share a room with him for a week.

I also believe it would be cruel to leave a dog locked up in a strange hotel room all day long.
 
People also leave their hotel rooms for long periods at Universal. Loews Hotels seem to manage just fine!

Okay - so the hotel manages just fine, but how do the pets do? I think the point the PP was making was that it wouldn't be great for a pet to be left alone in a room for so long. It doesn't really matter to me whether the hotel figures out how to clean/not clean the room and get out the pet odors from the accidents because pets were left too long. What matters to me is that the pets could be treated pretty poorly.
 
Okay - so the hotel manages just fine, but how do the pets do? I think the point the PP was making was that it wouldn't be great for a pet to be left alone in a room for so long. It doesn't really matter to me whether the hotel figures out how to clean/not clean the room and get out the pet odors from the accidents because pets were left too long. What matters to me is that the pets could be treated pretty poorly.

It doesn't matter how Disney would clean the rooms?

Read the thread were people suppose mousekeeping does not clean the rooms every day and than think what people would do if they got a smelly room.:rotfl2:

This reminds me of the "Smelly Cat" song from Phoebe :lmao:
 
Respectfully, then, people who choose to travel with pets are welcome to stay at a Universal property.

Disney apparently does not see the - need? point? value? - in designating pet-friendly rooms.

Universal is smaller than Walt Disney World in a number of ways: fewer park options, land, number of resorts, number of rooms, total time needed to experience all onsite attractions... and it's not as if all those rooms are pet-friendly. In RPH, only one wing is (and I'm not even sure if it's the entire wing or just certain floors).
 
I totally agree that pets should not be allowed at Disney Resorts, I have two dogs whom I :lovestruc to death, but would not subject them to being left in a room for hours on end with no one to take care of them, nevermind the mess my two would make, spastic Weimaraner and drooly English Mastiff. Personally, I wouldn't even have a good time if I knew they were there, unless of course I was using the boarding facilities on-site, which seems like the most reasonable option for all involved. It gives you the opportunity to spend time with your pet if you wish, leaves them with interactive activities to do all day, instead of being locked in a hotel room barking or chewing on things that they shouldn't, you know like the mousekeepers leg, and it allows you to go and spend guilt free time at the parks, knowing that your dog is being taken care of, instead of doing the pee pee dance in the hotel room waiting as patiently as they can for you to get back.
 
Alright, I know that this is besides the point of reality (since Disney is currently only discussing updating their kennels), but I'm wholeheartedly joining the NO side.

I love my German Shepherd. He is the love of my life (teehee.... don't tell my DH!) and it absolutely breaks my heart when he is upset or anxious or unhappy. We live in a very dog-friendly city and take him nearly everywhere that it is possible to take a large dog - stores, banks, coffee shops, my husband even takes him to work at his dog-friendly office building most days. We live in an apartment building in the downtown of the city, and so my dog is used to being quiet in close quarters, friendly but polite in hallways and elevators, and is always under strict voice control. My dog is well trained, quiet, friendly, and an ideal companion.

That said, I would NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS take him to Disney with us. He is well-behaved because we have him on a strict routine in familiar circumstances and familiar locations, and keep him exercised and entertained so he doesn't become destructive or mischievous out of boredom. However, even the slightest change in routine causes him to become stressed and upset - we ran a half marathon Saturday morning and had to leave the house at 4:00 in the morning to get to the start line shuttles. We returned (after a normally-timed absence) to a stressed out and crying shepherd. A simple change in our expected routine (leaving in the very early morning) caused anxiety - I can't imagine what being left in a strange hotel room for 12 hours would do to him.

I know that other hotels are doing it just fine, but the point is that I would not make the choice, as a responsible pack leader, to put my dog in that situation. Disney and dogs in hotel rooms are simply not compatible. I'm happier not worrying about my dog during my vacation, and he's happier playing with his new friends at a kennel-free boarding facility back home. Is he unhappy to be left behind? Perhaps at first, but at least he's in a safe environment, with professionals who can provide him with the care and attention that he needs.

Just my $.02.

Sarah
 
I'll be the lone dissenter. I hate the thought of animals in the resorts.

1) You are not a "lone dissenter".
2) I do not like staying at a pet-friendly hotel.
3) I do not like the smell of dogs in my room, let alone "accidents".
4) And, you CANNOT get the smell out.
5) People do not have to travel with dogs.
6) They can leave them at home, find a kennel, or use WDW kennels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top