YEKCIM
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
- Messages
- 3,042
Don't look too much into their shots for comparison as they are both very good photographers. In the equation, I think it is about 10% camera and 90% photographer. If you want to improve your technique, you should look at the books from Bryan Peterson. Understanding Exposure is an excelent choice, but there is a newer book by him that goes into the digital aspects a little more. I have heard that it is very similar to UE with added information on post processing.
Kevin
Keep in mind, too, that PP has a lot to do with it. Jeff is a master at PP and, though I'm still struggling with Picasa, even just a little PP can make a HUGE difference in the appearance of the final result. I'm not absolutely certain, but I *think* the review images on most, if not all, of the review sites are straight from the camera. DSLR's typically do less PP in-camera, although the amount of in-camera PP is user-adjustable. In order to get the most out of the digital file, some PP will be required. One reason I settled on the D50 is that it produces very good out-of-camera JPEG's, but I still have to do some PP in order to make them look the way I want them to. That is especially true of RAW images, which the camera does not PP in any way, as I understand it.
Hope that is helpful.
BTW, I'm just back from The World and hope to have some images ready to post in a day or two.
~Ed