If I apply your logic to our state, then our Governors over the last 10 years could also be criticized for flying flags here at half-staff whenever we lose a Michigander in Iraq or Afghanistan, since if we interpret those guidelines as being exclusive in nature, would also be "improper".
I'm not a PSU grad, or connected to PA in anyway. I also think that PSU did the right thing in firing Paterno. However... I have an understanding that what Paterno did over his unparallelled career was a whole lot more than just teaching guys to run around and throw an oblong inflated leather ball. It's that understanding that makes his act of incredibly bad judgement that led to his firing even more mind boggling. Go ahead and get your knickers in the twist if you want about flags in Pennsylvania being lowered, or stadium lights being turned on at night, or whatever you like.... but to me Paterno's passive response about what people told him about Sandusky isn't much more than a sad post-script to a much broader story.
I also don't agree with the critics in the OP's story that saying your sad that someone has died is tantamount to being "insensitive" to anyone or "ignoring" a moral lapse.
I live here in PA (I'm a transplant - grew up in Cleveland). I have no problem with it. JoePa was a hero to a LOT of people, and not just in PA. He and his wife did do much for Penn State and the students and players. This Buckeye fan is mourning his loss with the Nittany Nation. The tragic events that ended his career do not, in my mind, define Joe Paterno the man. Unfortunately, they do define him to a lot of others.
Rest in Peace, Joe. And to the Penn State fans, know that Joe is no longer in any physical or mental or emotional anguish.
I strongly disagree.
I would disagree with it if this scandal never happened. He was a football coach for crying out loud! He's not that special.
Do they fly the flag at half staff for truly great teachers or people who donate just as much or more money than Paterno did?
What kind of world do we live in when a college football coach is so revered like this?
I don't agree with it, but it has nothing to do with the whole scandal thing. I just think that's an honor that should be reserved for military, police, etc.
I completely agree. McQueary should have stepped in and taken teh child out of that situation, rather than retreating and doing nothing more than telling Coach Paterno about it a day or two later.... The one I put the most blame on by far (other than Sandusky, of course) is McQueary. He was young enough that he had been raised knowing that what he saw was wrong and what to do about it. Yet, he didn't know what to do and instead of doing what he should, he called his daddy? If he were a real man, he would have called 911 and Sandusky would have been at least unconscious by the time the cops got there.
I think that the poster was referring to the changes to the reporting requirements over time. Of course, as it turns out Coach Paterno acted appropriately based on the reporting requirements in place in 2002.This is the second time you have posted this.
Do you really want all of us to believe that raping young boys was ok back in Paterno's younger days? That because he was old, he didn't realize it was no longer acceptable in today's world?
Paterno was not in charge of Sandusky in 2002.And nobody is debating that McQueary is not equally to blame. But Paterno was the one in charge, so everbody looked to him as the leader, thus modeling keeping quiet is so much worse.
Ummm, it was McQueary that turned his back on a child who was being abused. Paterno wasn't told about it until a day or two later.I don't respect Paterno. I lose all respect for any person who would willingly turn their back on a child who was being sexually abused. They are on the same level as the abuser.
What did he do besides coach football? Here are some examples: http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/44244/your-joe-paterno-tributes
As far as not doing what he should have done (or what he thought he should have done), he was an old man by the time the behavior happened...Many things had changed during his lifetime. The one I put the most blame on by far (other than Sandusky, of course) is McQueary. He was young enough that he had been raised knowing that what he saw was wrong and what to do about it. Yet, he didn't know what to do and instead of doing what he should, he called his daddy? If he were a real man, he would have called 911 and Sandusky would have been at least unconscious by the time the cops got there.
What we all learned painfully over the last three months and were reminded of again poignantly this morning was that Joe Paterno was just a man - decent and caring but also flawed and vulnerable like the rest of us. I hope we can remember the man for both his successes and his failures and, in time, come to appreciate what he contributed to Penn State.
the reasons I believe this have already been posted in previous threads, which were closed for the nastiness and back and forth.
For those reasons, I voted and stated my feelings. For those reasons, I will not contribute to the nastiness or back and forth.
First, it should be noted that he was the football coach. Also, it should be remembered that he found out a day or two after the fact that someone who is not affiliated with the football program had possibly abused a boy in the athletic facility. He reported this information to the two people who were legally be responsible (both for allowing Sandusky continued use of the facilities and for reporting to the authorities) the athletic director and the university president.My observations:
In other threads, those who speak in support of Coach Paterno in terms of him having done "everything he could" by reporting what he knew use the argument that he "was only the footbal coach and reported the behavior to the proper people at the university and THEY are the ones responsible for not taking it further"...and so forth.
So he was "only the football" coach and had no power in the University to make the right thing happen???
Then why does he need a flag flown at half-staff if he was "only a football coach"?
The fact that folks think the flag should be flown at half-staff for Coach Paterno leads me to think he had more "power" than the average college football coach. He should have used that power to stop the molestation when he heard about it.
It could have been a very simple statement:
Coach Paterno: "Board of Directors and university officials, it has come to my attention that Mr.Sandusky is sexually molesting young boys. I will allow you 24 hours to go to the police, begin the investigation into what happened and do whatever necessary to make it right for these boys. If I don't hear a big announcement from you tomorrow with regard to this, including an action plan of what you intend to do to rectify it to the best of your ability, I will be going to the police and the media".
Do you think anyone at Penn State would have told him to shut up and sit down because he was "just the football coach". I doubt it.....
That being said, Coach Paterno cannot be held wholly and singly responsible for this mess, since there were numerous people involved who dropped the ball in a big way. Unfortunately for Coach Paterno, as the most "visible" and well known representative of Penn State, his reputation is going to take the beating....one of the drawbacks of fame.
There really isn't a lot of gray in this one folks, as much as everyone would like to try and convince us there is. If you know about child molestation, you report it to the police. It's a crime. It's their job to investigate, not the University's Board of Directors.
But you report it.
So what would happen if a business didn't lower their flags? What if they objected on moral grounds. Is there some type of fine or anything?
I completely agree. McQueary should have stepped in and taken teh child out of that situation, rather than retreating and doing nothing more than telling Coach Paterno about it a day or two later.
I think that the poster was referring to the changes to the reporting requirements over time. Of course, as it turns out Coach Paterno acted appropriately based on the reporting requirements in place in 2002.
Paterno was not in charge of Sandusky in 2002.
Ummm, it was McQueary that turned his back on a child who was being abused. Paterno wasn't told about it until a day or two later.
So many people in these threads are simply feeding off of each other's rancor, rather than considering the actual facts. It's truly troubling.
The governor's decision only affects those flags flown by state agencies.So what would happen if a business didn't lower their flags? What if they objected on moral grounds. Is there some type of fine or anything?
Many of the men who went through Coach Paterno's program would disagree, as would those people that he influenced outside of the program.He was just a football coach that it, I feel like flags should only be flown at half staff in honor of hero's.
A foootball coach isn't a hero, even without all the other stuff that happend.
The governor's decision only affects those flags flown by state agencies.
Many of the men who went through Coach Paterno's program would disagree, as would those people that he influenced outside of the program.
I believe that you truly believe what you typed. However, your position doesn't seem to be supported by the facts. I'll not make my mind up based on your or any one else's attempt at reading a dead man's mind.Sorry, spin it all you want but he knew and he washed his hands of it and tried to hide behind "I reported it to my superiors."
The people you mention and Paterno all have a share of the blame.
I think that what's sad is that many believe that it's just a game and that a person can get no more out of the experience than how to play football. Thankfully, people like Coach Paterno disagree with that position.That really sad. Then. Football is a game that all