I always wonder why "NFL type" Football is not in the Olympics, its a Major Sport in the US and Canada, and is coming along in Japan and Europe
It's not a worldwide sport. It's huge in the USA, a Canadian national team could play (maybe) to a standard a little better than college, but no where near as good as ANY of the NFL teams let alone an "All Star" team. In Europe the standard (without the American imports) isn't even at moderate college standard. No idea about Japan, but I doubt they have the physicality to deal with the Europeans let alone the Americans. The other problem would be getting the games played in the required time, NFL is not a game that lends itself to playing 3 games in 8 days. Of all the similar games, Rugby Union is the closest to getting Olympic recognition, and even then it would most likely be the 7 a side version of the game (regular games are 15 players a side). It has a much more genuine worldwide strength ( top countries are Britain, Aussie, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Argentina, Italy, Canada, USA, Japan, Samoa and Fiji). I'd love to see 7 a side rugby in the Olympics as it is a great spectator sport.
The point is that the US Open starts today, during the Olympics, and I think that any highly ranked tennis pro would value the US Open singles title over any Olympic medal. Compare that to sports where athletes spend four solid years training for a chance at an Olympic medal. So I don't get tennis as an Olympic sport.
I have to agree, it was pretty obvious than none of the "big boys" gave a flying fig for the Olympics. I understand why the organisers like to have tennis there ($$$) but unless the tennis authorities are going to give it support and make it a ranking tournement it's just wasting everyone's time and devalues the Olympic ideal.
I'm quite happy with basketball, it's a big sport in Europe and I think the results have shown the US isn't so far ahead that it's pointless having the competition. IMHO some of the US "stars" have been taught a lesson about competition, work ethic and team play, I'm reasonably sure they will know go on and win the gold, but it will be a medal they'll have to work a lot harder for than they thought when they decided to play in the team.
Badmington and table tennis are huge sports in Asia and pretty widely played in Europe. I think they have been quite entertaining and some great skill levels, I'm happy to leave them in.
Not too sure on Synro diving/swimming and Rythmic gymnastics but I think that has a lot to do of my dislike of sports where "experts" give marks for how "well" something is done, as we've seen most obviously in the gymnastics, unless the scoring system is done 1) correctly and 2) fairly , it can make for huge controversy.