I did not say that you shouldn't do the financial analysis for the transaction.
Nor did I say you did. You said
"This has NO disadvantages," and I was just pointing out a few potential disadvantages.
Buying direct for certain properties right now is actually quite competitive with the resale market.
Maybe...but you have to look at even the attractive ones with a critical eye. If a purchaser cares where their home resort is (and many are more interested in the price and maintenance fees), they should choose home resort first. Then check the numbers. Unfortunately, people sometimes buy a resort simply because it is the least expensive one Disney is selling directly, and that's a fundamental error, IMHO.
Buying direct for certain properties right now is actually quite competitive with the resale market. This is mainly due to DVC paying all closing costs and giving 2009 points for 2010 contract,
When you analyze any deal - direct or resale - you really need to understand what you are buying...and "giving 2009 points" is a perfect example of timeshare salesman doubletalk and half-truth.
They are
not giving you any points -- you are buying during the 2009 UY for that contract and you are receiving the points you are entitled to. If the DVC direct contract is already in the 2010 UY, you can't get the 2009 points because they have expired. They're
not "giving" you points.
What they
are giving you in that scenario is an extension of the banking deadline...and that is an important benefit, because it allows you to bank the points into the 2010 UY. That's a legitimate benefit, and something a resale company cannot do.
and if you are financing DVC has better rates (which the interest may or may not be tax deductible).
I don't finance, so I'm not current on Disney financing rates. (But I thought they were about 10.75%, which is certainly not a very good rate!)
A few years ago, Disney was an eager participant in the sub-prime bubble, financing at low rates and then bundling and reselling the mortgages. But that market went away, so they have to self-finance now and they have raised their rates accordingly.
Also it may be possible with resale to split the contract into 3 deeds out of one (but someone more experienced with the resale process can address that).
NOT possible -- only Disney can repackage points. (And if it were possible to repackage resale points, that would destroy your whole argument!

)
If they are buying resale, they would have
three closing fees to pay instead of one.
hberhman said:
Very true, however you failed to mention that closing costs are charged based upon the number of points in the contract. So you may indeed pay three closing costs which are marginally more than a single.
I don't know about "marginally more." I know TTS' lowest closing cost is $322. If you were buying three 50 point contracts in lieu of a 150-point contract, that's $966. I don't know the number, but I'm sure closing on a single 150-pointer would be WAY less than $966.
Sure, you can negotiate closing costs, but that's a maybe-yes, maybe-no kind of thing and
you'll have to give somewhere else to get that. I think the main usefullness of negotiating closing fees is to get to a higher per-point selling price which will clear ROFR.
If they are going to try to fine-tune a DVC portfolio, they will have
real estate commissions to pay on each contract they sell 
...
and if they're buying direct, they'll also have big losses on each contract. [/
hberhman said:
Yes that is true, however if financial hard times hit , it allows one to have options to remain a DVC member with the ability to sell a contract or two to lower the financial burden.
That's a good point, but keep it in perspective.
If someone bought SSR direct two years ago, they probably paid mid-90's. If they sell today, they will probably get mid-60's (maybe less, especially if they
have to sell) -- less 10% commission, they're looking at a net loss of about $35 per point ($95-$65 = $30 + $6.50 commission = $36.50 net loss).
This may be a great time to
buy resale, but the opposite side of that coin ain't so pretty!
___________
Technical suggestion: When you break up quotes, you have to go back and check the HTML tags. At the end of the other person's quote, you have to have
[/quote]. Often, when we "cut," we cut off the [/ part and the quote doesn't get displayed properly. If you preview your posts and see messed up quotes, that's usually the problem...which can be fixed by editing either before or after posting.