goofyernmost
Aged to Perfection
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Messages
- 10,713
Yes, because when CMs told me FPs were good until park closing, I should have said, "oh no, we'd never do that!"
Any changes they've made to the return policy are obviously in preparation for X-Pass, period.
Part I...Please don't twist around what I said to imply that I was morally against the extended window. I used it myself whenever I could. I said, many times, that Disney allowed it. What I said also, is that Disney never officially said anything to the public about a change in the rules. In fact, they continued to publish it on the FP that the window was an hour. If they had officially changed the policy, for public consumption, it would have reflected that. Everyone is trying to defend an action that was not in any way wrong. Disney told their CM's to allow it, they did and no one was doing anything wrong. However, that said, they never "officially" in writing to the public, ever changed the wording of the FP or said in advertisements or planning videos that there was a open ended window. They just let it happen if people tried it. BIG DIFFERENCE. Therefore...no change in public policy, they just changed the enforcement and directed CM's to follow the original plan. Why is that so hard to understand?
Part II...It is quite possible that you are correct and the only reason why they decided to enforce the window was in preparation for X-pass, but to say it with such force, like you somehow know that to be a fact, is curious. Your opinion is no more a "period" than anyone elses.





Not only did that change on March 7, but CMs started announcing the change at FP kiosks, additional signage was displayed, and IIRC the park maps were updated as well.

. I tend to take things as a much larger whole than others, since, most of the time, the force behind a cause is much more varied than it seems on the surface. I don't believe that it's solely for FP+, but I do believe that's a large part of it. I also assign a large portion of the blame on the two polar extremes: the extreme FP hoarders, and the extreme FP hall monitors. Without those extremes, the issues (perceived or empirical) would not have been large at all.
