Planogirl
I feel the nerd in me stirring
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2000
- Messages
- 49,731
Isn't that just the overall tank and not just the small portion allotted to the dolphins though?It's the 2nd largest aquarium tank in the world.
Isn't that just the overall tank and not just the small portion allotted to the dolphins though?It's the 2nd largest aquarium tank in the world.
It's the 2nd largest aquarium tank in the world.
This doesn't make sense - I just bought some designer perfume at Norway last weekend and the designer - Geir - was there signing the products sold. Pretty sure profits are going to his company with commission going to Disney. And his company is Norwegian and since he is Norwegian, he pays taxes in Norway - Norway and it's citizens are definitely benefiting from sales of Norwegian products in the stores. It is all connected.
Plus there is a tourism benefit to these pavilions. It encourages people to visit Norway.
Many Norwegian and Norwegian-ish companies sponsored the original pavilion in the 80s. You can still see the signs throughout - like SAS and Norwegian Cruise Line. I still think Norway and these companies are getting a free ride in terms of advertising and should put in more money though corporate sponsorships, Norway's tourism bureau, etc to update the pavilion since there is a benefit to Norway.
But that is up to them to decide. And seems like what they are deciding now - does the benefit of the pavilion out way the cost to update?
I agree with some previous comments that perhaps this model of relying on sponsorships just doesn't work that well?
There is no reason for Norway to part with such a large sum of money to a theme park in a completely different country. Why should they want a stake in something that, most likely, sees small returns for them?
The Epcot we have is NOTHING like the E.P.C.O.T that Walt envisioned and wanted. Not saying that is good or bad.....just saying that ruining WS and the Norway pavilion with a Frozen ride wouldn't be the thing that took away Walt's vision.Walt's concept was to expose people to various cultures so that more understanding and harmony could grow between the Earth's people.......However, can we keep to the original goal of the WS?
Context.Large sum of money?
$9m is only about 0.07% (Less than 1/10 of 1%) of Disney Parks revenue for LAST YEAR. To put this in personal terms IF you earn $100k per year (picked only to make the numbers simple), it's about $70 to you. To me $9m is a lot of money, to a country who's GDP is $515B, or a company that made $14.1B from theme parks and resorts alone not so much.
As far as small returns. Just looked it up on the official Norway Tourism site. They claim tourism brought 33.3B KNO ($5.3B US) into the country in 2012 (last year they have numbers up for.)
Really I'm having a hard time seeing where $9m is "such a large sum of money". Seems to me $9m is a deal, for a small bump in numbers for 2013/14
I agree. Cheap and lazy - a bit of a ongoing theme recently.
It doesn't fit in the world showcase and if they want a Frozen attraction it more appropriately belongs in DHS which could really use it or else MK.
Has anyone mentioned this idea yet?
Convert Blizzard Beach to Frozen with Olaf as the park mascot.
The Epcot we have is NOTHING like the E.P.C.O.T that Walt envisioned and wanted. Not saying that is good or bad.....just saying that ruining WS and the Norway pavilion with a Frozen ride wouldn't be the thing that took away Walt's vision.
This doesn't make sense - I just bought some designer perfume at Norway last weekend and the designer - Geir - was there signing the products sold.
I don't think that most would mind a bit of Disney-fying however the rumor is that Norway would in essence vanish and become a fake land of princesses and that has some people upset. The Frozen characters being around in some way isn't so bad but them taking over is or at least I think so.
Time to make Epcot a top shelf park again!!!
Is that the stuff that smells sooooooo good when you exit the ride into the gift shop? I almost sprung for some of that on our last trip, but changed my mind when I found out the cost.Would love to have some though . . .
Not only that, but Frozen is the biggest animated film of all-time...surely that warrants an all-new state-of-the-art attraction?!?!
I might get in trouble for this a little bit but I don't hold back.
world showcase is all about showing the world. getting rid of a ride that shows Norway and its past and present for a frozen ride would be a step in the WRONG direction. Don't get me wrong a frozen ride would be a great investment for disney but epcot is not a place for it. maybe in hollywood studios where they need something new and the new frozen summer fun will not last past summer and after that all hollywood will be is a park with rides and disney is much more then that
With all due respect, what's different about it?
Norway has seen an increase in tourism and benefited from Frozen.
Forks, WA has seen an increase in tourism and benefited from Twilight.
Personally, I think that ship sailed when they turned Akershus into a Princess meal. As I recollect, forgive me as it may be a false memory, but I don't think the Norwegian cast members were happy with that change either. Not sure what will happen--but it does seem precedence has been set for Norway to be something other than a representation of the Country of Norway. And we still miss the Viking ship. :-/