Dean
DIS Veteran<br><a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
- Messages
- 39,228
That is not at all related to what I was trying to say so let me try again. My points were:I may be confused by what you are saying, do you mean that you don't think members who did not use the free valet would care if their fees were increased to cover the cost of valet parking for others.
That no matter how many people actually used the valet, it was still a minority of the guests at that given time, a minority of the owners at that resort and a minority of all owners. And that in reality this issue was not a major component of any decision that was made.
That unless it was a significant MAJORITY of the guests at a given time, it would not make sense for DVCMC to roll this charge into the fees in ANY way in the absence of a significant volume discount which my info suggest would not have existed at the time. That situation may or may not exist going forward.
Sorry to not have been more clear.
As I've noted, I think this is very possible going forward. Most locations with similarities to what WDW does charge for self parking an amount around what the valet currently is and charge MORE for valet. LV is the big exception but each hotel group is competing with the others for your $$$ and hoping to get far more out of you than the parking fee would be.I think they are gathering info as to how many cars are using the lots that are not resort guests. Gaylord Palms charges you to park in their lots. If you dine, see ICE, shop, you get a voucher for a discount on the parking. I truly think eventually Disney will go to something like this.