sam_gordon
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 27,543
.
I hate it, too, and I work with two women who do it for most of their correspondence. Drives me nuts!
LOL. Our supervisors even came up with 2 letter abbreviations for the subject line. RO=read only. AR=action required. And I have been chewed out by our supervisors for making someone have to open an email when everything they needed could be put in the subject line.If someone does this at work, their supervisor should be having a discussion with them about how to use email.
Yes, I know. Your work is unlike most.LOL. Our supervisors even came up with 2 letter abbreviations for the subject line. RO=read only. AR=action required. And I have been chewed out by our supervisors for making someone have to open an email when everything they needed could be put in the subject line.
I can understand if a company has an understanding between employees. But I also get this from people who don't work with us or for us (general public). I'm not convinced emailing is easier than texting, unless maybe you're sending to a distro list.Almost SOP in my office. Usually just something like "fire 1234 Main Street". Reporters and Photographers don't have to open the email to get all the information they need. Sort of like texting, I guess, just easier.
That would make a little more sense. The problem is the emails I get give you no clue that the subject line is all there is, so you open the email expecting more information and... nothing
- Use subject line tags:
- N/T: No text
- EOM: End of message
- NRN: No reply necessary (everyone’s favorite thing to receive!)
I've actually never seen this done!