I admire that he jumped right into problem-solving and identifying places where he could reduce his expenses. I wonder if he employed the “hang up and call back because you might get a different answer” strategy? I also think I would have waited a *little* longer to see if they change their tune. Instead, he went straight to the press. And we are only a couple of weeks into this! That kinda rubs me the wrong way...
The article quotes Universal, stating, “We work on a case-by-case basis.” To me, that insinuated that Universal (and the other parks) would have given him a pause, but mean, greedy Disney won’t. When the truth is, they may have given him the same answer Disney did.
That's an iffy comparison. There's a big difference between pausing a $50 monthly payment and offering a $6billion loan with a high interest rate... if we're saying Disney should do what their creditors are, it'd be like they would pause payments, then ask for double the amount owed after payments resume.I'm glad he went to the press. Disney needs to stand up and do the right thing here. Their creditors certainly are by floating them a rather generous loan. Very disappointing to see that someone with the foresight to get his priorities in order isn't being honored.
That's great they are extended the discount (since a good portion of it won't be able to be used due to the closure).Sun and fun room rate discount extended through end of August:
interestingRumor: Patent submitted for Wreck It Ralph Attraction to replace Stitch's Great Escape...
Can't provide source...
I'm glad he went to the press. Disney needs to stand up and do the right thing here. Their creditors certainly are by floating them a rather generous loan. Very disappointing to see that someone with the foresight to get his priorities in order isn't being honored.
Can’t provide source because they aren’t allowed here...Rumor: Permit submitted for Wreck It Ralph Attraction to replace Stitch's Great Escape...
Can't provide source...
EDIT: Permit, not Patent.