The description sounds just like the one at WDW. Is it an updated version? I didn’t read that in the article.
Unfortunately I wouldn’t hold your breath for updates...
That said, I’ve always felt like they should add some random scenes to this. With a little bit of work it could be an awesome attraction featuring so much of Disney’s great music. And they could proclaim it as a re-imagining and everybody would be excited to watch again. (EDIT: Not that it isn’t already an awesome attraction that I visit every time I’m at WDW - I’d just love to see something new)
I guess I was thinking not such a big update - more like a “sprucing up”. (And versus the possibility of it possibly going away) I find it hard to believe that the film quality would be the same in these new parks as in MK, right? And, though unrelated to other parks getting PhilharMagic, MK’s could use some new glasses...and refurb the effects.
A lot of the smell sprayers no longer work, and whats Philharmagic without the scent of apple pie?! Philharmagic is overdue for a renovation and glasses replacement.
I like the attraction just fine, but the glasses are in sorry shape. Hard to see anything at all.A lot of the smell sprayers no longer work, and whats Philharmagic without the scent of apple pie?! Philharmagic is overdue for a renovation and glasses replacement.
PointI just want to point out we have a thread for stroller talk and a thread for smoking.
I’m sorry but, you and all of the people that liked your post are making an invalid assumption here. Jumping to conclusions without all of the facts. The correspondence was IN PARK specific. Just thought I’d let you know since you jumped on me and told me what they didn’t do.They didn't lie. There are still smoking areas at the resorts and at Disney Springs, as well as outside each park. They're only getting rid of the smoking sections in the parks.
I think this is where you want to head:I’m sorry but, you and all of the people that liked your post are making an invalid assumption here. Jumping to conclusions without all of the facts. The correspondence was IN PARK specific. Just thought I’d let you know since you jumped on me and told me what they didn’t do.
The description sounds just like the one at WDW. Is it an updated version? I didn’t read that in the article.
News
Leonard Maltin’s take on Dumbo and really all the remakes being made
https://twitter.com/leonardmaltin/status/1111321192957276161?s=21
The version that opened in DLP last year was the same video as WDW but a better quality. Also, the floor/seats moved at one point, making it more 4D. Can't remember if that happens at WDW or if the seats at DCA could do this but it was a cool thing nonethless
News
Leonard Maltin’s take on Dumbo and really all the remakes being made
https://twitter.com/leonardmaltin/status/1111321192957276161?s=21
I think saying what a lot of us are - to do a remeake just as a remake seems silly and just a $ grab... if you come at it with a new take, that is one thing but otherwise no way you can leave be up to a classic
I think this topic is really amplified win how many remakes they have coming out this year. If it was only one a year it might be easier to take - but when you think back to when these movies came out, they were only coming out one animated movie every 2-3 years, now we have 4 remakes in one year
What I've always understood from a business standpoint, but never understood from a creative standpoint, was taking a good movie and making it 'again'. Doesn't it make more sense/is less risky from a creative standpoint to take a bad movie and re-make it well? Better yet, why go from animated to live-action? Why not the other way around? While I haven't see a lot of Disney's older live-action movies, The Black Hole comes to mind. The vision for a movie like that was probably well beyond the technology they had at the time. Well it's 2019 now, the technology exists. They can re-make it with great special effects, or even make an animated version.
I know it falls on deaf ears because the name recognition seems to trump all (unfortunately) but I just keep thinking of the potential opportunities they have in their library.
I think the other issue is when they do something new it flops. Look at bfg, nutcracker, and wrinkle in time. I feel like artemis fowl is destined to fail as well, but I hope not.I agree with much of what you two said.
I did see a point on twitter that one reason they do keep making these live action version of old films is for international consumers. China for instance has never seen these old Disney films and doing these live actions familiarizes them with these stories.
All of those mentioned though are based on books though.I think the other issue is when they do something new it flops. Look at bfg, nutcracker, and wrinkle in time. I feel like artemis fowl is destined to fail as well, but I hope not.