News Round Up 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
So not to go to deep back to Friday, but I wanted to put down a couple thoughts about the positive and negatives of Disney using the Purposed Virgin Trainline option from MCO to Tampa with a Stop near WDW. I find the more I think about it, the more I see several things that could make it improbable but not necessarily impossible.

First point I want to make is that Magical Express Costs Disney alot of Money, and WDW is the only park that offers free transport from a Airport to the Parks for all guests. We are sadly in the Era where we see Disney cutting costs where they can to improve profit, this is why alot of people are afraid that Disney will eventually charge for Magical Express as alot of the other third party on site hotels charge for the transport from the hotels.

Second point I want to make is that Disney is laying the ground work for slowly pulling back some of the money they give to Mears who runs the Disney Magical Express and provides overflow busses on really busy Park Days, aka Christmas time and other holidays. Example the slow roll out of the Mini Vans, these although way more expensive then Mears taxis or the Uber option on site, is a good show of how Disney is trying to expand into more ways to maximize transport options to the profit of the Disney and taking away some of the Mears lines of revenue. If you look on site even in the past 6 years, you can see that there are alot less Mears taxis around, granted the reason for alot of that is because of the rise of Uber and Lyft and their cheaper pricing, but even with that since Disney is its own Municipality instead of making it harder for Uber or Lyft to exsist on property with laws, they actually worked specifically with Lyft and started rolling out there own Disney fleet of Mini Vans, thus helping to limit the number of Mears Taxis on site.

Third point I want to make is that Disney is making it more expensive for you to drive your own car and park on Disney property, for all non Florida AP\DVC Residents. Besides AP holders and DVC owners, no one parks for free on Disney property anywhere near the resorts or Parks, with the roll out of Resort Parking fees for anyone not on DVC or with Dinner Reservation and the increases in Parking Fees over the past few years for Theme Park, Disney is trying to make money off anyone staying on site who likes to have their own car and the ability to leave the bubble. They are in essence trying to regulate both the traffic onsite and discourage people who like to stay on site by making it cost prohibitive to drive on site. Since we know Disney does this type of stuff in a long term planning. I wouldnt be suprised if Disney started these back when they did as part of the preparation for the 50th. They have been working on the roadways as we know as part of those plans as well. This could be part of a two prong solution to both increase revenue and help offset the cost of building and maintaining those roads while trying to discourage the practice of renting or driving your own car down to Disney. Granted the rise of Uber drivers also might be part of the need to limit the wear and tear that the traffic of Disney is seeing.

Fourth point I want to make is that Disney is its own Municipality, as such they can make their own ordinances as they want, this also means they have a robust city planning department. Yes we can make the Distinction about Reedy Creek technically being independent of Disney but we all know that is mostly just a legal distinction and not the actual facts of the matter. This is important for the fact that if a high Speed rail link was made to Tampa as planned, even though the current plans drop off a short way off property, if a link was to be made from that mainline to Disney the amount of hoops for building would be astronomically less than what Virgin currently has to go through to make there building plans a reality. With Disney behind them at least politically they could more easily get approvals from the various other localities and state Agencies as Disney has its own massive political weight in Orlando and the State of Florida in general. ( I am not going into the debate on uneven Corporate Political Power, that would be a completely different topic and one not needed on the boards.)

Now after those Four points, we can then go into the Benefits and negatives of a train option to Disney and the possible changes or death of Magical Express it might cause.

Benefits of Train option for Disney, moves costs away from Mears, I could see this happening in two ways. One way is Disney and Virgin working out a deal for some sort of offshoot rail spur that drops off on actual Disney property, which would cost major money for building cost, but if it wasnt a free service, depending on the Cost it might be worth the extra construction cost. The other way which might be more likely is that instead of running the line to Disney property, it follows the line picture that writerguyfl posted and instead of Disney Magical express as we know it, there exists a similar service at the train station that drives the short way to Disney properties and the resorts respectively, be this a solely Disney owned and run option or in concurrence with Mears but at a much lower cost since the distance is so much shorter and their isnt the airport fees that the buses must pay to park at MCO, is something that Disney could work out. Also this allows Disney to encourage people in state to not drive up to WDW but use the train and be in the bubble, which also increases the use of the transfer service. For those that worry about baggage that I am sure the baggage option for not needing to pick up your baggage from the Airport wont change much as that is still handled by trucks and such on the backend but I could also see that being able to be worked into it from train operations as well, which would allow the bags to be transferred to a Disney Baggage car and allows people from Tampa and or Miami also to be able to take part in this option this would mean that the baggage wouldnt need to be picked up by trucks or delivered by trucks at the airport but instead a much closer option the train terminal, saving money on fuel and time and probably labor.

The negatives of this is, that yes it would save Disney money but no it would not be free, even with Disney saving money on it, I wouldnt expect this option to be free to use, instead you would pay for the ticket prob through Disney and the money passed onto Virgin with a possibility of Disney taking a small cut. Another would be the frequency of trains, I can see this becoming a issue, that yes although it could feasibly be quicker than Magical Express currently is to get from MCO to WDW, if the trains only leave every 30 minutes to 1hr than it could potentially take longer then what we currently have. To combat that, there would need to more trains on the track which means more money, or a express line which are not anywhere near the plans right now. I see both of these things quite unlikely which means more than likely unless you arrive with perfect timing, there is a good chance it would take you longer to get to WDW from MCO then it currently does, not to mention the wait to transfer to a bus. That begs us to question does Disney care that it might take longer if it saves them money, allows them more time to get your room ready and actually increases there profit? Its a good question, I think it would depend on how much longer it would take and the potential money difference Disney would see with someone not being on property that much quicker and spending money that much sooner.

Another negative is the guest reaction, alot of people wouldnt like this, they will complain, Disney might try and spin this type of change as more Environmental friendly as a way to counter act a PR backlash, but it will only go so far, especially for those guest that have more conservative views and are less friendly to Disney climate pollution reduction policies.

Another negative, is how would bad weather which Florida is prone for, effect the whole system. A huricane on either coast could easily effect the line, even though WDW is in Orlando which doesnt experience the weather the same way. A stopage or even a slow down of trains at either point of the line could cause a stoppage that would effect guests taking the train from MCO. Although Disney wouldnt be liable for it, they do take a risk of angry guests and possible effects of delayed revenue due to these events. Sure they could switch to buses like the currently have during these situations, but Disney by that time would not have such a robust terminal at MCO and it would still lead to delays and angry guests. The question is more so of risk acceptance. Disney at least right now has more control over the Mears operations due to the robust contract they have and the long operation relationship, Mears also allows Disney a more nimble response to guest needs then a rail line would.

A third option would be a modified option to keep both Disneys Magical express, which honestly I would still see as a charge, at a slower time schedule, as well as promote a rail option. The problem with this other option is that although you would see less buses needed at MCO, Disney would still be paying alot to Mears for this operation. They would still need busses to transport from rail terminal and as such would prob not be saving as much money in the long term. Also it would be hard for Disney to claim the environmental high card in PR releases. I see this as the most unlikely option unless it was part of a phase out option with Disney eventually switching to a rail option.

Another thought is that if Disney does do away with a Magical Express option, I could see universal investing it taking that spot over at MCO, with them announcing a third gate and the likely hood of them putting up more resorts near it, I could see Universal wanting a more Branded option even if it also wont be free, I could see a lucrative contract for Mears to help supplement the loss of Magical Express. Right now to get from MCO to universal you can already book a shuttle with Mears, but a similar option as Magical Express for Universal with the increases in resorts they are having and now the third gate, might not be a bad option in their future.


So after saying all of that, what do I really think. Well honestly I would love a rail option and I am sure Disney would love to cut the cost of Magical Express, I see it unlikely in the near future or even next 10 years of this happening, due to the length of time it would take to build the infrastructure for such a project, but knowing Disney I am sure someone is looking into these options as a possible long term solution, as we all know Disney has plans many years out. Even if such thing was to come to pass Disney would still more than likely rely on Mears to facilitate the transfers from the Cruise Ships to WDW as having to maintain that as part there fleet would mean they would need to have a more robust operation and costs at the port, which I dont see as something Disney would want to undertake. Disneys relationship with Mears is a long one, and I see the need for profit and reduction of vehicle traffic as something Disney is actively following, but where it takes us in the future, really depends on the higher ups and how the economy fares in the future.
 
Looks like the main entrance system /tickets and passes was not working about an hour ago, not sure if it's up yet.
 
Interesting article in yesterday's Washington Post:

Childless millennials are passionately defending their Disney fandom

By Hanna Sampson July 28 at 12:40 PM

Millennials are blamed for ruining everything from trust funds to cereal to mayonnaise, but now they’re also getting grief for something they love: Disney theme parks.
On Friday, New York Post writer Johnny Oleksinski lit a match and tossed it into a pile of dynamite with this headline: “Sorry, childless millennials going to Disney World is weird.”
To quote Walt Disney: "Laughter is timeless. Imagination has no age. And dreams are forever."

Now shut it and hand me a churro.
— Robert "The DCD" Workman, Writer Guy For Hire! (@thedcd) July 27, 2019
Oleksinski claims “letting a kids brand control your adult life” leads to “stupidity and cultural ignorance,” not to mention immaturity. “Many millennials,” he argues, “are fine with sticking to ‘A Whole New World’ rather than exploring a whole new world.”
He was riffing off an alleged Facebook rant that had emerged on Reddit months earlier that was purportedly written by a mother whose Walt Disney World vacation was ruined by childless couples. The complaint involved a pretzel, long lines, an unhappy 3-year-old and exhaustion, but the bottom line was that millennials were to blame. “People without CHILDREN need to be BANNED!!!!” the post says.

That post found new life earlier this month thanks to Twitter user @JenKatWrites (who says she has never been to a Disney theme park) and sparked several straightforward news stories before Oleksinski weighed in with his take. It was not well-received by many social media users.

Some pointed out Walt Disney World publishes an adult guide to the parks with nary a child in sight, promising “Enchantment for All Ages … Especially Adults!” Others questioned whether the company’s reigning childless rodents, Mickey and Minnie, were exempt from the criticism. And others wondered if the real weird ones are parents who bring kids who are too young to form actual memories.
I’m going to make a “childless millennial” shirt and wear it to Disney
— Jenna Ezarik (@jennaezarik) July 27, 2019
However, a few on social media seemed to agree with the New York tabloid post, even if they are usually at odds with the publication. “Broken Clock Finally Correct,” one user wrote. Others were flabbergasted that anyone without kids would even want to brave the theme park crowds.

Though it is getting the most pushback, the New York Post isn’t the first publication to chastise childless couples for heading to Disney parks.
In 2016, a Thrillist writer asked: “What’s With All You Adult Couples Who Vacation at Disney World?” Last year, a blogger on a Memphis site for moms wrote a post headlined “Dear Child-Free Millennials: You’re Ruining Disney World.”
As a father of two young kids who has taken them to Disney, I just want to know why a childless couple would subject themselves to torture.
— Eddie Ayala (@fasteddieayala) July 26, 2019
For the record, and in the sake of journalistic transparency, the writer of this very article is an adult without children who has visited Walt Disney World many times. She does not believe this is weird.

Still, some who are public about their love for theme parks say the question of the week is one they’ve heard frequently.

Nikida Metellus, a 35-year-old pharmacist who lives near Walt Disney World in central Florida, writes the ThemeParkHipster blog. On the site, she offers a guide to people who want to visit theme parks by themselves — a practice she still enjoys, even since having a daughter nearly two years ago.

Metellus said she hasn’t paid much attention to the recent rants, in part because it sounds familiar to her.

“I’m kind of used to hearing people ask about it or questioning, ‘Why do you go to Disney as an adult? Is it weird?’ ” she said.

For her and other millennial friends — many who don’t have kids — the parks are full of happy memories and comforting familiarity. They enjoy reliving some of the experiences from their youth, with the added bonus of adult perks like “drinking around the world at Epcot,” Metellus said.

“I don’t think they’re weird,” she said. “We all just think that Disney is made for everyone who wants to go there and have a magical time.”
 

Interesting article in yesterday's Washington Post:

Childless millennials are passionately defending their Disney fandom

By Hanna Sampson July 28 at 12:40 PM

Millennials are blamed for ruining everything from trust funds to cereal to mayonnaise, but now they’re also getting grief for something they love: Disney theme parks.
On Friday, New York Post writer Johnny Oleksinski lit a match and tossed it into a pile of dynamite with this headline: “Sorry, childless millennials going to Disney World is weird.”

Oleksinski claims “letting a kids brand control your adult life” leads to “stupidity and cultural ignorance,” not to mention immaturity. “Many millennials,” he argues, “are fine with sticking to ‘A Whole New World’ rather than exploring a whole new world.”
He was riffing off an alleged Facebook rant that had emerged on Reddit months earlier that was purportedly written by a mother whose Walt Disney World vacation was ruined by childless couples. The complaint involved a pretzel, long lines, an unhappy 3-year-old and exhaustion, but the bottom line was that millennials were to blame. “People without CHILDREN need to be BANNED!!!!” the post says.

That post found new life earlier this month thanks to Twitter user @JenKatWrites (who says she has never been to a Disney theme park) and sparked several straightforward news stories before Oleksinski weighed in with his take. It was not well-received by many social media users.

Some pointed out Walt Disney World publishes an adult guide to the parks with nary a child in sight, promising “Enchantment for All Ages … Especially Adults!” Others questioned whether the company’s reigning childless rodents, Mickey and Minnie, were exempt from the criticism. And others wondered if the real weird ones are parents who bring kids who are too young to form actual memories.

However, a few on social media seemed to agree with the New York tabloid post, even if they are usually at odds with the publication. “Broken Clock Finally Correct,” one user wrote. Others were flabbergasted that anyone without kids would even want to brave the theme park crowds.

Though it is getting the most pushback, the New York Post isn’t the first publication to chastise childless couples for heading to Disney parks.
In 2016, a Thrillist writer asked: “What’s With All You Adult Couples Who Vacation at Disney World?” Last year, a blogger on a Memphis site for moms wrote a post headlined “Dear Child-Free Millennials: You’re Ruining Disney World.”

For the record, and in the sake of journalistic transparency, the writer of this very article is an adult without children who has visited Walt Disney World many times. She does not believe this is weird.

Still, some who are public about their love for theme parks say the question of the week is one they’ve heard frequently.

Nikida Metellus, a 35-year-old pharmacist who lives near Walt Disney World in central Florida, writes the ThemeParkHipster blog. On the site, she offers a guide to people who want to visit theme parks by themselves — a practice she still enjoys, even since having a daughter nearly two years ago.

Metellus said she hasn’t paid much attention to the recent rants, in part because it sounds familiar to her.

“I’m kind of used to hearing people ask about it or questioning, ‘Why do you go to Disney as an adult? Is it weird?’ ” she said.

For her and other millennial friends — many who don’t have kids — the parks are full of happy memories and comforting familiarity. They enjoy reliving some of the experiences from their youth, with the added bonus of adult perks like “drinking around the world at Epcot,” Metellus said.

“I don’t think they’re weird,” she said. “We all just think that Disney is made for everyone who wants to go there and have a magical time.”

It's not even like millennials are the first generation to go to Disney without children. My parents did adults only trips when I was a kid, my mom went once when she was in her 20s before she had even met my dad.
 
I honestly don’t know what to consider large or small for something like this. I’m sure when Netflix first started their list wasn’t huge either. I expect it to grow pretty quickly.
But they have access to a MASSIVE catalogue right off the bat -- why choose such an incredibly limited list?? I don't get it.
 
I honestly don't think the line up is that sparse. Sure, its not nearly as expansive as other streaming sites, but I still think its good. Not great, but good. I used to subscribe to Shutter (Streaming for horror movies )for a similar price, and that line up isn't nearly as good as this line up, comparatively.

Also, keep in mind what Netflix was like in their early days of streaming- they only had 2 big movies, the rest were b and c films, many that never had a theatrical release.
ALSO, this service is almost 50% cheaper than Netflix's HD service, and a 20% cheaper than the Netflix "barebones" package. Also, Disney gives you a sizable discount if you sign up for a full year. So, that means up to if you compare a year of Disney + to a year of Netflix, it is 36% less than Netflix basic, 56% less than Netflix Standard, and 64% less than Netflix Premium.

And, it appears Disney + will have the same features as Netflix Premium.

Also, not included on that list are the Day 1 original movies, shows, and documentaries, exclusive to Disney+.

So, I still think it looks like a good buy.

SO, in short, here's the TL;DR:

Doesn't look great, but still looks good.
Looks better than other niche streaming services with similar price points
Price is much cheaper than Netflix.
The list doesn't include everything.
Apples and oranges IMO. Netflix was an unknown quantity wrt streaming when they started that -- and didn't have their own content. Disney has access to a MASSIVE catalogue and has competition right out of the gate. People will rightly expect more from Disney than they did Netflix years ago.

Agree to disagree. I think this is far too small an offering and there is no chance I'm paying for it until they add much, much more.
 
Last edited:
Interesting article in yesterday's Washington Post:

Childless millennials are passionately defending their Disney fandom

By Hanna Sampson July 28 at 12:40 PM

Millennials are blamed for ruining everything from trust funds to cereal to mayonnaise, but now they’re also getting grief for something they love: Disney theme parks.
On Friday, New York Post writer Johnny Oleksinski lit a match and tossed it into a pile of dynamite with this headline: “Sorry, childless millennials going to Disney World is weird.”

Oleksinski claims “letting a kids brand control your adult life” leads to “stupidity and cultural ignorance,” not to mention immaturity. “Many millennials,” he argues, “are fine with sticking to ‘A Whole New World’ rather than exploring a whole new world.”
He was riffing off an alleged Facebook rant that had emerged on Reddit months earlier that was purportedly written by a mother whose Walt Disney World vacation was ruined by childless couples. The complaint involved a pretzel, long lines, an unhappy 3-year-old and exhaustion, but the bottom line was that millennials were to blame. “People without CHILDREN need to be BANNED!!!!” the post says.

That post found new life earlier this month thanks to Twitter user @JenKatWrites (who says she has never been to a Disney theme park) and sparked several straightforward news stories before Oleksinski weighed in with his take. It was not well-received by many social media users.

Some pointed out Walt Disney World publishes an adult guide to the parks with nary a child in sight, promising “Enchantment for All Ages … Especially Adults!” Others questioned whether the company’s reigning childless rodents, Mickey and Minnie, were exempt from the criticism. And others wondered if the real weird ones are parents who bring kids who are too young to form actual memories.

However, a few on social media seemed to agree with the New York tabloid post, even if they are usually at odds with the publication. “Broken Clock Finally Correct,” one user wrote. Others were flabbergasted that anyone without kids would even want to brave the theme park crowds.

Though it is getting the most pushback, the New York Post isn’t the first publication to chastise childless couples for heading to Disney parks.
In 2016, a Thrillist writer asked: “What’s With All You Adult Couples Who Vacation at Disney World?” Last year, a blogger on a Memphis site for moms wrote a post headlined “Dear Child-Free Millennials: You’re Ruining Disney World.”

For the record, and in the sake of journalistic transparency, the writer of this very article is an adult without children who has visited Walt Disney World many times. She does not believe this is weird.

Still, some who are public about their love for theme parks say the question of the week is one they’ve heard frequently.

Nikida Metellus, a 35-year-old pharmacist who lives near Walt Disney World in central Florida, writes the ThemeParkHipster blog. On the site, she offers a guide to people who want to visit theme parks by themselves — a practice she still enjoys, even since having a daughter nearly two years ago.

Metellus said she hasn’t paid much attention to the recent rants, in part because it sounds familiar to her.

“I’m kind of used to hearing people ask about it or questioning, ‘Why do you go to Disney as an adult? Is it weird?’ ” she said.

For her and other millennial friends — many who don’t have kids — the parks are full of happy memories and comforting familiarity. They enjoy reliving some of the experiences from their youth, with the added bonus of adult perks like “drinking around the world at Epcot,” Metellus said.

“I don’t think they’re weird,” she said. “We all just think that Disney is made for everyone who wants to go there and have a magical time.”

Why does anyone care what other people do in their personal time? In the entire gamut of things one could possibly get upset at in this world, someone liking to go to a theme park without children has got to be so far down the bottom it shouldn't even be on someone's radar. Likewise, the issue is so trivial that people taking the time to draft up articles and responses to such a post could be spending their time on something of more importance. My reaction is the same to both the viral post as well as people defending their love for Disney theme parks...

"k".
 
The childless Disney thing is nonsense in my opinion. It stems from a viral FB from 2018 and somehow made the rounds once again because the NY Post decided to make it a story. All it is doing is upsetting people for no reason. Who care who and why someone goes too WDW. Lets all just be happy that we can go to WDW or any Disney destination for that matter childless or not.
 
So if I'm understanding the article correctly whatever scanner system they use for physical tickets for whatever reason wasn't working?

Now I'm wondering what their backup 'old school' way is because if someone told me that because I didn't have that newfangled thing called a MagicBand that I wasn't getting in for 2 1/2hours I'd be quite upset.
Usually when a scanner isn't working they bring out the iPads and iPhones.
 
The childless Disney thing is nonsense in my opinion. It stems from a viral FB from 2018 and somehow made the rounds once again because the NY Post decided to make it a story. All it is doing is upsetting people for no reason. Who care who and why someone goes too WDW. Lets all just be happy that we can go to WDW or any Disney destination for that matter childless or not.

It's 100% click-bait because they know people will talk about it. They are getting all the clicks and press they were hoping for.
 
Oh those series of Articles make me laugh, everyone in them who is ranting about Millennial ruining WDW or it being for kids, are looking at it from rose colored glasses, and Im not talking Beauty and the Beast here. Me and my wife are childless Millennial, we go on several vacations a year and not every one of them is Disney. No we dont run around looking for all the characters and yes we are excited everytime we go. Its not the Mouse that makes Disney fun for us, its the atmosphere. We take tons of time to sit and people watch, or eat at sit down restaurants, we have the luxury of WDW not being a once and a life time event so we take our time and just exist in the moment. These people who are upset at millennial seem to only be focused on giving their kids the enjoyment of the experience and seem to be living for there children excitement. I am not saying that anyone who enjoys there kids being happy is wrong, what I am saying is that you cant just live for your kids, maybe if those people would take a step back at WDW and open their eyes and take a deep breath, they two would get that sigh of contentment alot of us childless Millennials get at WDW.
 
Oh my god, some of us decided not to have children and go to Disney before Millennials did. ;)

Disney streaming - I wonder why they don't have all the classics on there? Like why is it Lady and The Tramp - live action remake? Why not the original? I would pay for streaming just for that.
 
Apples and oranges IMO. Netflix was an unknown quantity wrt streaming when they started that -- and didn't have their own content. Disney has access to a MASSIVE catalogue and has competition right out of the gate. People will rightly expect more from Disney than they did Netflix years ago.

Agree to disagree. I think this is far too small an offering and there is no chance I'm paying for it until they add much, much more.

It’s really odd that they seem to be holding back so much stuff. When I signed up for Hulu years ago, it was cheaper and had far more content. I expected more from Disney, the offerings make it seem like they want to be an add on service and not a full on competitor with the big 3.

Between that list and knowing that content will be removed, it’s far less desirable than I had hoped.

Basically the original content now has to absolutely kill it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.













Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE








New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top