Wasn't the rumor that Nintendo Land would be split into different pieces in different parks in Orlando? That would cause a backlash, especially if you're there specifically for Nintendo stuff.
That rumor did exist, but briefly. It is now confirmed to *not* being going into the children's area at universal studios. A totally different IP is being looked at to replace the Fievel\Curious George\barney section now.
There was a time that a lawsuit was preventing them from building a themepark on the new land. I suspect these were backup plans to keep Nintendo happy while they worked through that. You can't strike a huge deal with Nintendo to bring it to your themeparks and then say, "well, we want to build it in our third gate, but we have a year of legal work to see if we can make that happen. Just be patient." Nintendo would have wanted some idea of what, where, and when things would be built. Placing various properties in IOA and USO would have solved that on paper.
Why would they when they have a such a hot property to "force" you to go 3 different parks? They already require you to get their version of a park hopper as the ONLY way to ride a Potter-based attraction, why is having more Potter in a 3rd park that shocking?
Yea, the hogswart express/park hopper combo has been *extremely* lucrative for them. Also, they would never want to put all their harry potter stuff in one park. A lot of people simply wouldn't go to it. I mean, I'm not a huge harry potter fan (as far as the movies go), but I do find Diagon Alley and Hogsmeade to be a *lot* of fun to explore. I never would have even tried them if I had to go to a Harry Potter exclusive park to see them.
Thanks for the post - I can't say there is anything that is unbelievable in this statement. (Well, that they would build a land based on Trolls - but that's just YOUR speculation.) And you very well could be right about the "no lines" concept. I think it would be very hard to incorporate that to 100% of a theme park, but it could work. I COULD for instance see something like SW:GE have some sort of "reserved only" system for their two rides where you can either get a FP+ ahead of time, OR you can get a reservation for one of the rides the day of. Keep say 50% of the slots for FP and 50% of the slots for day of and don't have a queue. If you limit it to only a couple of rides, it could work pretty well. ALL rides could be problematic with the average Joe that isn't any good at planning anything and just randomly stumbles onto the next ride they will ride. (This is a pretty big percentage of people.
The troll's speculation is fueled by a few things. One, it was almost what they themed the entire kids section at USO to after they decided to move Nintendo to the new park. Designs were made, a sequel movie is in the works, and it is considered by management over there to be duel gender. It could very well all be scrapped. On the other hand... they love to reuse their ideas over there. Second, the guy I was talking to made it clear he was *very*confused by the IP they had chosen. To me, that eliminates the obvious ones like Shrek, Kung Fu Panda, How to Train your Dragon... Now,, him being "puzzled" by it could be subjective. But the guy was an imagineer of over 20 years before spending the past 5 or so doing contract work. He was involved in the primary ride at Galaxy's Edge as well as several Universal Projects in recent years. So I would think he is aware enough of the current culture of things to have a pretty good understanding of what will and what won't gel with people these days.
If you look at the possible dreamworks ips you have:
Shrek
How to Train your Dragon
Kung Fu Panda
Madagascar
Boss Baby
Trolls
And then if you dig even further back:
Megamind
Croods
Rise of the Guardians
Monsters vs Aliens
But none of those even have sequels on the books.... so why build a whole new land based on what is essentially a dead property?
The top three seem like the go to choices. So they are likely out. Boss Baby has a netflix show.... but I honestly don't believe they are stupid enough to theme a whole park section after that. So if you don't dig back into older IP's that don't have any sequel's in development.... that just leaves Trolls. A property that already had planning for it prior to this. So, whether anyone else agrees with my analysis of it, that is how I came to that conclusion.