Eoghann
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 1,717
That's not how definitions work. A Kia doesn't stop being a car because Lexus exists.
All apples are fruit but not all fruit are apples.
Theme parks are amusement parks but not vice versa.
That's not how definitions work. A Kia doesn't stop being a car because Lexus exists.
They sure do.
The original Six Flags, Six Flags Over Texas, was built around the theme of, you guessed it, the six different flags that flew over Texas. Each of these flags was represented by corresponding lands: Spain, France, Mexico, etc. with rides to match the theme. Other Six Flags parks also have various themed lands. In more recent (relatively) years, they have also included the theme of Warner Bros. animation and DC super-heroes. Now it can easily be argued that Disney's focus on its thematic elements, as well as its execution, far exceed those of Six Flags or other theme parks, but that doesn't stop them from being theme parks. It simply means some theme parks are better than others.
At some point along the way people on the Disboards somehow began equating "theme" with "quality." You can dislike Six Flags (for no shortage of reasons I might add), but that doesn't change the nature of the park.
Yeah...I'm sure that's what they found.
But it's hot as hell and there's plenty of daylight...and it's an 18% reduction In time on the ticket.
Are they reducing the prices 18%?
It's just more of the same that nobody can be bothered to care about:
more for the same or the same for less...
It's just aggravating that the "we can't be open if it's not packed" mentality is now accepted standard.
I am not sure where the Six Flags v. Disney argument started. I am not going to really argue about the subject. This is what I am going to say. A few years ago, someone at work asked me: What's the deal, why do you go to Disney so often, do you like rollercoasters?
No, I don't visit Disney for the Rollercoasters at all. I can come to Disney and probably not even ride a ride and have a great time. Not that I am going to do that. What I like about Disney is the theming, the attention to detail, the atmosphere, but above most the storytelling. I don't come to Disney for the cheap thrill. I come to Disney to embrace the story.
I'm glad I'm going next week. I was under the impression that Symphony in the Stars was a "permanent" fixture.
EDIT: According to Disney Parks Blog, the dessert party runs until March 19th. So they will last until then, at least.
The water parks always seem quite deserted the last hour or so when I am there.In this case I don't care because I've never used the water parks anyway. If I want to swim I'll use the resort pool. It's a blatant cost saving measure on Disney's part, just not one I care about.
I'm pretty sure that's what I stated in my last sentence.Channeling my inner LoL.. what we have here is very simple to explain.
A new MBA grad student came in and tried to prove himself. He did what he is supposed to do and pulled in "big data" analytics from Magic Bands and spending at the water parks/hotels.
Here's what he found:
Thus, they made the logical conclusion that the water parks were not profitable in the last hour and stealing potential inflow of cash from other locations by staying open that last hour. Shut them down early and funnel people to Theme parks and Disney Springs where they will start spending again.
- Spending at water parks was near $0 for the last hour of operations
- Guests staying at Disney hotels who were at Parks that closed at 8pm, tend to go back to their hotel (early night)
- Guests at Parks that close before 8pm, tend to NOT go back to their hotel
Just a guess. But I'm right of course.
Saw Disney on Ice tonight for the second time ever with the last time being like 8-9 years ago.
Saw Disney on Ice tonight for the second time ever with the last time being like 8-9 years ago. The theme was princesses so you'd think of Frozen was bound to be here right? Nope not one stitch of Olaf, Anna, or Elsa. The main acts were Cinderella, Snow White, and Tangled. Some classic with a taste of new I thought was good. You then of course had Mickey, Minnie, Donald and Goofy tagging along.
Saw Disney on Ice tonight for the second time ever with the last time being like 8-9 years ago. The theme was princesses so you'd think of Frozen was bound to be here right? Nope not one stitch of Olaf, Anna, or Elsa. The main acts were Cinderella, Snow White, and Tangled. Some classic with a taste of new I thought was good. You then of course had Mickey, Minnie, Donald and Goofy tagging along.
I'd probably prefer not too.Likely due to the fact that there is a separate Disney on Ice Frozen show. Maybe you can go to that one when it comes to your area.
Yeah I didn't have to pay anything for tickets as a friend of ours got a suite to watch the show. I did notice the prices for popcorn and cotton candy though.We took our daughter too it a few weeks ago. Good show, cheap tickets (through her Girl Scout troop). We did note the park-like prices on a small bag of cotton candy ($12!!!!)
Saw Disney on Ice tonight for the second time ever with the last time being like 8-9 years ago. The theme was princesses so you'd think of Frozen was bound to be here right? Nope not one stitch of Olaf, Anna, or Elsa. The main acts were Cinderella, Snow White, and Tangled. Some classic with a taste of new I thought was good. You then of course had Mickey, Minnie, Donald and Goofy tagging along.
...may want to keep that to yourself next time![]()