Ruttangel
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,834
Okay since it is in the same association now it comes down to just being a shorter contract length still. I guess it makes sense that if they are doing a conversion do it now and get it done with especially with resale prices of VGF.
Question is how this impacts resale prices now?
Yeah I’m just not 100% sold that there’s absolutely no angle they could use.I could definitely be wrong because I don't know much about timeshare law, but assuming it follows normal real estate law you can incorporate new additions into a condo association with their own set of rules/restrictions. The rules that currently govern the O14 only apply to existing contracts - new additions should be able to enter existing associations under their own terms. I believe the issue they ran into with the O14 is that they were attempting to change existing real estate contracts. Here, there are no existing contracts and I would think they absolutely could give new points the same restrictions as RIV points (but of course I will be happy to be corrected)
This development brings up some interesting questions:
1 They are doing the conversion in just about a year. That sound incredibly quick to me considering they would need to build in a small fridge, microwave, sink, etc.
2 What does this say about Rivera sales? Will that resort be sold out then? Or are they feeling so much push-back from the restrictions there that they needed to add some non-restricted inventory?
This development brings up some interesting questions:
1 They are doing the conversion in just about a year. That sound incredibly quick to me considering they would need to build in a small fridge, microwave, sink, etc.
2 What does this say about Rivera sales? Will that resort be sold out then? Or are they feeling so much push-back from the restrictions there that they needed to add some non-restricted inventory?
They can't do anything to originally declared points because they are a real estate interest regardless of who owns them (DVC or an individual). The original association rules would apply because they were declared into the original association under those rules. The only thing I have to go on is real estate law, but in real estate law if you bought into a neighborhood with certain HOA restrictions, those restrictions would always apply for the lifetime of the HOA no matter if the lot were sold back to the developer or not. But a developer can always declare new sections into the association with modified HOA restrictions.Yes but by this logic why wouldn't new points bought direct from o14 resorts be restricted (which they aren't)
I wonder if they would consider making these concierge level rooms...or maybe doing a floor (or two) concierge? Presumably they will be a different booking category. When they did AKV originally -- were Jambo and Kidani done at the same time?
That’s funny
That’s funny
I’m not the only one wondering about that tiny chance...
- Barring unexpected legal maneuverings on DVC's part, Grand Floridian resale buyers should have access to all current resorts except Disney's Riviera Resort
Fascinating....
But it's an interesting note of WHY this is happening.
They have been dumping off GFV rooms at 55% off on Hotwire. With strong demand elsewhere at WDW, they get very low demand at Grand Floridian.
Simple enough reason: They are over-charging for Grand Floridian.
But they don't want to cut the prices -- They do have plenty of people willing to spend $800 per night at Grand Floridian, but not nearly enough to fill the rooms.
So the solution? Cut the number of cash rooms.... Sell them to DVC so they are "always occupied"..
So yes, if you buy into the GFV expansion as DVC, you are getting "40% off rack rates".... though if there was no DVC, you'd be able to get the rooms at 55% off rack rate on hotwire!
This development brings up some interesting questions:
1 They are doing the conversion in just about a year. That sound incredibly quick to me considering they would need to build in a small fridge, microwave, sink, etc.
2 What does this say about Rivera sales? Will that resort be sold out then? Or are they feeling so much push-back from the restrictions there that they needed to add some non-restricted inventory?
When VGF-2 is launched and sells out in 2 weeks (because it is linked to original non-restricted contracts) DVC may wonder why it ever bothered doing it to RIV, it was a complete own goal.It says nothing about Riviera sales. There is a fair chance that the new GFV rooms will have the same restriction.
The announcement specifically says that they will be part of the original GFV association. It won't be a new resort.It says nothing about Riviera sales. There is a fair chance that the new GFV rooms will have the same restriction. (Depends if they simply add the rooms to the existing GFV or designate it as a new resort).
So, they are taking the short term here? I thought the hotel rooms at the GF were always pretty heavily booked during normal times. Going forward they will have fewer regular rooms available.What it does say: They are having trouble booking those rooms as regular cash rooms. If they were getting 90% occupancy at Grand Floridian, they wouldn't be taking out cash inventory. The removal of cash inventory demonstrates the difficulty they are having booking the rooms.
Hey weird we agree on something!Fascinating....
But it's an interesting note of WHY this is happening.
They have been dumping off GFV rooms at 55% off on Hotwire. With strong demand elsewhere at WDW, they get very low demand at Grand Floridian.
Simple enough reason: They are over-charging for Grand Floridian.
But they don't want to cut the prices -- They do have plenty of people willing to spend $800 per night at Grand Floridian, but not nearly enough to fill the rooms.
So the solution? Cut the number of cash rooms.... Sell them to DVC so they are "always occupied"..
So yes, if you buy into the GFV expansion as DVC, you are getting "40% off rack rates".... though if there was no DVC, you'd be able to get the rooms at 55% off rack rate on hotwire!
I think the lesson is that Hotel-DVC hybrids have hidden issues when you need to shot down some facilities to deal with demand destruction. A pandemic is hopefully a once in a lifetime event, but this was the 2nd time in 20 years that they’ve had to close resorts due to factors outside of their control. It will likely happen again. Best to keep some properties you can close completely.I think Disney churns back and forth whether they like more DVC or more hotel. The pandemic told them DVC is good even if a PITB because owners still want to show up when Disney wants to be shut down. The expenses were paid though!