Dean
DIS Veteran<br><a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
The reason I say this is many were very timid about it. And this situation creates and air of uncertainty and perceived risk that was not there previously. I agree I would look at it the way you are but I think many would just not fool with it no that might have been willing to reluctantly give it a try before. We shall see.mochabean said:Dean,
I agree with most of your logic, except this part:
If I was willing to rent on a limited basis before, I wouldn't think DVC would consider me a commerical renter, and so I would feel comfortable continuing to rent on a limited basis.
Maybe over time, but it would limit members choices.This may be a good thing in the long run. Here's why. Disney reserving high demand times with exchanged points makes them as much of a commerical renter as the commercial renters they are trying to stop. Even if point morphing and commercial renting ceased, Disney itself still has an impact on availability of high demand times due to the points it rents out at these times. If a higher point cost for exchanges significantly reduced the number of people willing to exchange, then Disney would have less points available to rent and would thus reserve less high demand time than it does now.
ETA: A subset of members has shown no reason to think that the value, or lack of, of these cash equivalent exchange options has any bearing on their decisions and I think that group will grow under the current situation. Maybe you're giving many of them too much credit.