NEW Rejected Offers Thread

I think my point has been tho, that for 2042s, holding out for a certain cost actually makes a bigger deal on a per point analysis, than other resorts given the lower number of years to spread the cost difference over. Simple math, is all. What that number is, will depend on everyone's own cost analysis and comfort level. My comfort level is lower as I'm comfortable renting, as i honestly hadnt realized was uncommon.
 
I think my point has been tho, that for 2042s, holding out for a certain cost actually makes a bigger deal on a per point analysis, than other resorts given the lower number of years to spread the cost difference over. Simple math, is all. What that number is, will depend on everyone's own cost analysis and comfort level. My comfort level is lower as I'm comfortable renting, as i honestly hadnt realized was uncommon.
Yes, probably wise to assume your entire purchase price will go to $0 over your holding period and be OK with that on the 2042s.
 

IMO, this is really short-sighted on the seller's part. Unless that contract was loaded with Double Points and/or they are willing to pay fees, there's no way they get that. I think we'll start to see the 2042 properties dropping quite a bit over the next year. Buyers need to start realizing as we get close to the 15 years til expiration mark that there's just better deals to be had at other properties.
I agree. I'm looking to add BRV and have seen some really strange listings lately. Some sellers are asking outrageous prices for 2042 contracts — especially those with October to December Use Years — that are stripped through 2027. Like, what the heck?! You’re effectively only getting 15 years of use out of an already limited 17-year contract. If I'm going to consider something like that, the price better reflect it with a significant discount.
 















New Posts





DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top