boatboatboat said:
fonz
I see you are in NY.
Little chilly up there i imagine?
I suggest you turn your thermo down 5 degrees tonight, from where you have kept it all winter, and see if your wife notices.
Funny you should mention this. Seeing as energy costs continue to rise around the country, that's what this debate should be all about.
Last year, we kept temperatures in the house at 71 throughout the winter, and it was toasty warm. This year, we kept them at 67, a four-degree difference. It was a bit less warm, but I was comfortable nontheless. As was the "wife" you asked about. For clarification purposes, there are no children involved here, surely they would be long gone by now with 67 degree temperatures in the house.
Anywho, that 4 degree change in temps has saved approximately $350 to date. Not a ton of money, but enough for an annual pass.
It was a cost analysis decision, just as this one surely was for Disney. I have already made my point that I believed Disney handled this situation poorly. That being said, I don't have a problem with it. If you don't change, you'll see your dues increasing quite a bit over the next few years. That's life. And I believe, as I'm sure they do, that quite a bit of people would be more concerned with dues going up 30 percent by '09, than the temps of the pools.
Now look at all of the amenities Disney offers. So many people have stated, "Well, they should've found something else to cut." Yet, with the exception of one or two people, there have been few logical ideas.
So instead of complaining, let's hear some ideas. How do they cut costs? And as a follow-up, we'll compare those ideas to the number of people they would effect compared with the the lowering of pool temps by 4 degrees for 6 months of the year. Should be an interesting discussion. Let's go.