Just remember, last hired is often first fired.
True in Union shops, but on the salary/non-union - usually its highest paid, longest term who have hit their max position in salary ranges. In short the people who are priced above market for their position.
As for future of layoffs, possilbly, most companies are looking at all options, but companies are VERY cautiously making any decisions that could affect remaining staff after a layoff as it continues to destroy morale and causes defects of top performers/star employees, the ones companies do not want to lose.
My friend was looking at a park hourly full time position.He was going to move to Orlando area but if full time hours can get cut to 32/week there is no way he can do it.
![]()
Don't forget there is one good point in the recent announcements, profits decreased! At least there are still profits which is a lot more than many companies can say these days, so things aren't really that bad at Disney!
I was thinking of moving down there to work in the security field so maybe I should apply at US.
I was thinking of moving down there to work in the security field so maybe I should apply at US.
That's why in my DH's area they fired his supervisor (non-union) with all the experience and hired someone who doesn't have a clue? Hardly....new guy is less $$$$. Can't do a fraction of the other person's job. That's how the layoffs began.....then it was just completed during the second round with a buzz saw...departments fired and staff rehired as consultants.....less $ and no benefits. This benefits morale how again?
Trust me, Disney can't possibly care a smidge about morale.....because it's gone in the places where I know castmembers. It's all about $$$. Castmembers have always been disposable in the Disney system.
I know you're somewhat disgruntled from past posts, and I can appreciate that, but coming from Finance, I can tell you layoffs are rarely the preferred path.
Disney does care about morale, they don't want defects of star employees to competitors (and yes Disney does have competitors). Defects decrease revenue and profit as they reduce productivity. Most companies also prefer to do a one through sweep rather then hitting the pot multiple times, again because it generates morale issues and reduced productivity.
As for your husband's manager, although from your perspective the employee was productive etc, you also do not know the other side. Maybe his performance reviews were less then stellar, maybe he was difficult in dealing with superiors, failed to met goals and achievements. When push comes to shove, those are the people that are often first to go (not always) through general cuts. Deliberate cuts based on volumes/production/reorganization are another subject because usually performance isn't a measure, rather matching staff to specific levels and eventually even solid performers are impacted.
This isn't to say companies do not make mistakes in the rush to action and either cut too deep (or too shallow) but I am a realist and coming from my background, I know all too well how these things work as often some of the decisions are made at my level.
How about being told to remove the coffee pots to save electricity.....that improves morale how? It DID result in people being out of the building much more....in line at Starbucks.
I know you're somewhat disgruntled from past posts, and I can appreciate that, but coming from Finance, I can tell you layoffs are rarely the preferred path.
Disney does care about morale, they don't want defects of star employees to competitors (and yes Disney does have competitors). Defects decrease revenue and profit as they reduce productivity. Most companies also prefer to do a one through sweep rather then hitting the pot multiple times, again because it generates morale issues and reduced productivity.
They really don't care about their "star" CMs because if you saw the list of people that were let go, many of them were the ones producing results and moving the company forward. People who had good relationships with their superiors were treated badly in the end. Their superiors read from a script and offered not even an "I'm sorry", "it was a pleasure to work with you", "let me know if there's anything I can help with" or even the most obvious "do you have any questions". They were read from a script