I'm just curious...has anyone had
no problems with charging to their room since the whole "hold" thing started? Specifically, someone who is charging over $100/day to their room? We have a sufficiently high credit limit that even if we end up with double the amount of charges to our card (meaning that we have the same amount in holds as we do in actual charges), we'll be fine. The thing that concerns me is the multiple holds and having our Disney Visa flagged for fraud. Of course, I don't even have a trip planned at this point and probably won't be there for at least another year, so I don't really need to worry about this because I know the situation could change 10 times between now and our next visit. But I'm not happy unless I'm worrying about something that doesn't even affect me at this time.
Just wanted to throw some random comparison info out there. None of this is "news" to me, I'm just sharing the info for comparison's sake. We just returned from a 3500 mile road trip (that did not include a Disney visit.

). We stayed at 6 different hotels during that drive -- mostly Choice Hotel properties. We did not charge anything to our room during these stays (we literally just slept and showered in these hotels...usually only being on property 12-13 hours). We stayed at 3 different Comfort Suites properties. All 3 of them said they would be putting a $50 hold on our card for incidentals but nothing ever showed up on our account (I checked through the app several times a day). The Sleep Inn & Suites *did* put a $50 hold on our card that immediately showed as a pending charge. It disappeared within 24 hours after checkout. At La Quinta Inn & Suites they said they would put a $50 hold on the card but what showed up was a $92.50 pending charge (in addition to the $120 for the room). I have no idea where that amount came from. It stayed a pending charge for 4 full days after check out before finally disappearing. At Tru by Hilton, they said they would do a $25 hold. What they actually did was add $25 to the cost of the room -- so the amount that immediately showed as a pending charge on our card was $126 ($101 for the room + $25 for incidentals). Within 24 hours of check out, that pending charge was gone and a new charge for $101 was put through (I'm guessing the original amount was just modified).
Four different "brands", four different ways of handling the holds. We did use the same credit card at each hotel. I expected the Comfort Suites and Sleep Inn & Suites to handle things the same way since they're part of the Choice hotels, but they didn't. The common thing about each of the hotels (including Tru) was that they had a sign at the front desk indicating that upon check-in, they would be putting a charge through to your credit or debit card for the total cost of your stay plus a $50 (or $25) hold for incidentals. They explained that if nothing was charged to the room, the $50 hold would be cancelled/credited at checkout. However, even though *they* would releasing the hold at checkout, it could take up to 7 days for your credit card company or bank to credit that money to your account and that there was nothing the hotel could do to speed that up -- it was all at the discretion of the credit card company/bank. The last sentence (that was in all caps at some of the properties) said that they strongly suggest that guests DO NOT use debit cards the pay for their room or incidentals and that they wouldn't be responsible for any overdraft fees due to money not being available in these accounts because of the holds.
So this is obviously an industry-wide issue, not just at Disney. Just throwing that out there for people (like me) who don't do a lot of traveling or don't have a lot of hotel stays outside of Disney. The issue of holds not falling off immediately and debit accounts having issues of insufficient funds due to holds not falling off is not a Disney issue in general...which I already knew, but now I have recent personal experience. That $100 limit that is causing the multiple holds/hits to a credit card is a Disney issue but that's a whole other conversation.