Kathi OD
<marquee><font color=blue>The first person to repl
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Messages
- 12,879
First, let me say that I'm not for bailouts of any kind, but some things are just not as black and white as they seem.
I'll agree and I'm a union member. Our contract is up in June. The district has asked us to consider changing our insurance provider and entering the state employees insurance pool. It will save our school district a minimum of $1 million per year. The insurances are comparable, so most members have agreed, in principle to this change. However, our business administrator has decided that all supplies must be ordered from a specific vendor. This vendor does not necessarily provide the best prices for the supplies that we use. However, using just one or two vendors makes it easier for the BA to do her job since she only has to deal with a couple of vendors. Additionally, she wants an assistant at a cost to the district of about $140K/annually.
So in exchange the union has suggested that this practice of using one and only one supply vendor be changed so that we can get the best prices available. The give backs have to go both ways.
Maybe you can't limit the salary, but you can limit the bonuses. It is crazy that some of these people are getting huge bonuses for doing a lousy job. There has to be some corporate responsibility too.
Maybe the UAW has gone overboard with their idea of "fair pay," but one of the things that has helped bankrupt the industry is the high tariffs placed on US autos by other nations compared with the tariffs our country places on their autos. Hard to compete in a global market when the other guy has a fairly big advantage.
I'm not anti union. After all, it is the union system that created safe business practices. But the contracts that are negotiated when times are good seem set in stone even in bad times. Some unions strangle the industries they depend upon.
I'll agree and I'm a union member. Our contract is up in June. The district has asked us to consider changing our insurance provider and entering the state employees insurance pool. It will save our school district a minimum of $1 million per year. The insurances are comparable, so most members have agreed, in principle to this change. However, our business administrator has decided that all supplies must be ordered from a specific vendor. This vendor does not necessarily provide the best prices for the supplies that we use. However, using just one or two vendors makes it easier for the BA to do her job since she only has to deal with a couple of vendors. Additionally, she wants an assistant at a cost to the district of about $140K/annually.
So in exchange the union has suggested that this practice of using one and only one supply vendor be changed so that we can get the best prices available. The give backs have to go both ways.As for CEO's etc, I don't think you can limit how much they make. However, I do think that taxpayers can demand stipulations be attached to OUR tax money. Once public funds are tapped all other free market rules regarding freedom with in-house money must be suspended.
Maybe you can't limit the salary, but you can limit the bonuses. It is crazy that some of these people are getting huge bonuses for doing a lousy job. There has to be some corporate responsibility too.
Unions serve a purpose but when auto line workers are making $42/hour to tighten bolts on a car, something is wrong there. Yes, at the turn of the century when labor laws were non-existent, unions provided FAIR pay and safe working conditions. Now, they make sure that the US auto industry bankrupts itself because they would NEVER consider a pay decrease like airline employees have been asked to take year after year. Again, I am NOT anti-union, just the autoworkers union has gone overboard with their 'fair pay'.
Maybe the UAW has gone overboard with their idea of "fair pay," but one of the things that has helped bankrupt the industry is the high tariffs placed on US autos by other nations compared with the tariffs our country places on their autos. Hard to compete in a global market when the other guy has a fairly big advantage.