furb & dez
City Bear Jamboreers
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2011
- Messages
- 1,371
Putting lipstick on a pig does not change the fact it is a pig.Compared to its Florida counterpart the Autopia is quite a little gem...
Putting lipstick on a pig does not change the fact it is a pig.Compared to its Florida counterpart the Autopia is quite a little gem...
- New hotel and DVC in DTD
TDA (Jedi hand-wave), these are the rides you're looking for.
Somehow, if Autopia were to be removed I have a feeling that the same type of ride would be built in Carsland on a smaller footprint. It just seems so perfect.
As for Marvel, I originally hated it. But after seeing concept art (not Disney) for a proposed park in Dubai, I think it could be quite interesting. Heres the link
http://disneyandmore.blogspot.com/2010/09/now-that-dlp-ceo-revealed-that-dlp.html
The Marvel park would be great, though, and Disney could make it everything that Magic Mountain wishes it were--clean, family-friendly, professional, better food, etc. I'm sure they will find some way to work Disney decor into the park and develop some hybrid character costumes like IronMickey or Thorfy.
If you've ever been to Universal's Islands of Adventure you may agree that the Marvel area, despite being absolutely cool, has a threatening, unwelcoming and eerie feel woven into its comic-book setting. Yes the attractions are great, yes the characters are famous and imaginative, yes it is cool! But the innocence, the welcoming feel, and the warmth that radiates through most every Disney Park I fear will be lost and will have a negative impact
I'm a little surprised that they are thinking of going with Marvel. Didn't people complain because DCA didn't have a "disney" feel? I don't think Marvel has that feel. I also don't think that Indiana Jones and Star Wars have a Disney feel either, but they go well with their respective lands. And Marvel would not fit in any existing land.
I guess you could have Marvel Land, or Comic Book Land, or Hero Land but it would stick out like a sore thumb at either park. Marvel could possibly fit in the Hollywood back lot, but since they revamped Hollywood land to look like the roaring 20s, it would stick out there. Plus the back-lot is already a hodge-podge with the muppets, Mad T and Monsters Inc. Unless they solidify a solid theme back there, it is going to become DLR's junk drawer.
Thus, concludes my dissertation on why a Marvel theme must have it's own park if Disney wishes to build it in California.![]()
I think a Marvel or "hero" themed park could work well. Right now DL & DCA is largely marketed towards younger kids. There are some rides that are interesting for teens & adults, but *most* of the rides skew young. In DL, even the "E-ticket" aren't all that scary - no loops or anything like that. I think something with more modern thrill rides, but still having the Disney "feel" (attention to detail in theming), would be a huge draw for older kids and adults.
I would love to see Test Track and Mission: SPACE come to DL. Those were both big hits with my family.
From http://miceage.micechat.com/allutz/al062612a.htmI missed that part...![]()
The last thing that needs to slot into place before the third park gets underway is an expansion of Disney owned hotel rooms in Anaheim, with more DVC units attached to any new development. Weve told you in the past about the solid proposals to build a new hotel and arrival complex in the East Esplanade shuttle bus loading area, as well as a fourth DVC tower at the Disneyland Hotel slotted for the vacant land just west of the ESPNZone.
Walt Disney intended DL to change over time and not turn into a museum. Some of the rides from the 60's and 70's just would not work today. DL does a nice mix of the nostalgic and the modern. Tomorrowland especially must remove rides because the vision of the future changes so much over the last 50+ years.It would be sad to see Autopia and the subs go. Autopia has provided generations of children with their first driving experience. Sadly, they have revamped Tomorrow land before.
Many people in this thread have claimed they would be sad to see Innoventions go. Some of you will remember that the revolving theatre that is now Innoventions, originally housed a fun and musical attraction called America Sings. The majority of the animatronic animals that sang tributes to American music are now housed in Splash Mountain. As an 8 year old boy in the late 1970's, this attraction taught me a great deal about the music that shaped our country, and I'm still sad over the closure of that attraction.
Some one mentioned a Tron ride. Once upon a time, an attraction called the People Movers featured a Tron tunnel.
This past weekend while on vacation in Disneyland, I rode the Nemo subs. While I like the characters from Nemo, and many children on the attraction appeared to enjoy it, the experience left me longing for the original Submarine Voyage attraction.
At times, Disney has shown utter disregard for tradition as they have destroyed the opportunity for memories to be created by the young genrations of today and tomorrow by removing such attractions as the ones I have already mentioned in this reply, and others such as Bear Country. This past weekend as I literally walked right on to timeless classics such as the Jungle Cruise, the Haunted Mansion, and waited only 5 minutes for Pirates, I feared that if these wait times stay short, that could signify a loss of interest to the Disney execs, and those classics may also someday disappear. While I know that some change is necessary from time to time, Disney should add new attractions without taking away beloved classics. Innoventions and Winnie the Pooh which both replaced other classic attraction are essentially empty. Hey Disney, how are those changes working for you? Why don't you leave the new rides for DCA, and this rumored 3rd park.
I think it's great that Disney has the rights to Marvel and can utilize those characters. While I have often imagined how cool a Marvel land, or a Marvel attraction would be, I think an entire Marvel park would be tiresome. Maybe a 'Hero' themed park that incorporated Marvel, Incredibles, and some tributes to real life heroes like policeman and fireman would be more fitting.
Walt Disney intended DL to change over time and not turn into a museum. Some of the rides from the 60's and 70's just would not work today. DL does a nice mix of the nostalgic and the modern. Tomorrowland especially must remove rides because the vision of the future changes so much over the last 50+ years.
Many people in this thread have claimed they would be sad to see Innoventions go. Some of you will remember that the revolving theatre that is now Innoventions, originally housed a fun and musical attraction called America Sings. The majority of the animatronic animals that sang tributes to American music are now housed in Splash Mountain. As an 8 year old boy in the late 1970's, this attraction taught me a great deal about the music that shaped our country, and I'm still sad over the closure of that attraction.
Some people say that that they can't imagine that a Marvel park or land would be "Disney" enough. Well, I've never been to WDW but I can't wrap my head around what's "Disney" about zoos, water parks and world expositions but people seem to like them a lot so maybe Marvel would work. Plus, I think a Joss Whedon designed ride would be a kick. (But that's a whole different board.)
The Marvel world is something with a breath and complexity you'd need to develop stories for a whole variety of rides and other experiences. Enough for a whole park? Maybe. Marvel is a big complicated world. In many ways it's a lot more complicated than the Disney world so it just might be. But I'm not sure that enough of the general population is familiar enough with the details of it to enjoy the minutia. Then again, my 6-year-old has never seen the Song of the South and her devotion to Splash Mountain is tremendous.
My 1 problem with a Marvel theme park is that I don't think the settings are that unique, fun, or whimsical. What makes Animal Kingdom (naughtazu) "Disney" is that it transports guests to such amazing environments. Where else do you get to go on an African safari, climb Mt. Everest, go back in time to a dino-filled jungle, and bury underground a humongous tree in a day? Same with the water parks...they bring guests into fantasy-filled atmospheres. And clearly you haven't been to WDW because Epcot's World Showcase is far from a simple expo.
My concern is that the settings of Marvel characters are way too similar and...frankly not all that exciting. I'm positive that the attention to detail would be there, but I'm really not sure of the "magic" feel behind a whole park themed to urban cities.
I think a single attraction (like a stunt show!) or perhaps a themed land would work better...I just don't really see how the brand could stretch out an entire park.
The last thing that needs to slot into place before the third park gets underway is an expansion of Disney owned hotel rooms in Anaheim, with more DVC units attached to any new development. Weve told you in the past about the solid proposals to build a new hotel and arrival complex in the East Esplanade shuttle bus loading area, as well as a fourth DVC tower at the Disneyland Hotel slotted for the vacant land just west of the ESPNZone.
Neither does Star Wars --- and, well, Star Tours. I hate that it's in DL, as it has NOTHING to do with Disney. Alas, there it is. And people LOVE it because they love Star Wars. They seem not to care that it has nothing to do with Disney....This leads me to the agreement with James Cameron about Avatar. I'm extremely concerned that this will lead them to create an AvatarLand that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Disney Experience.....
There is an entire hands-on exhibit area inside Innoventions that is all about Nanotechnology....TL used to have a more "science-y" feel to it. They could do more of that. Look at the cutting edge science out right now and go from there. Nano-technology, (There I go back to Inner Space again! ) building a colony on the moon or an underwater city. I miss the science "edutainment" mixed with fantasy.
Here's my thought on Autopia: If they were planning on getting rid of it, wouldn't it make sense to put a "drive yourself" experience in Cars Land? While adults don't see the allure of Autopia, kids LOVE it. I just don't see it going any time soon -- or later for that matter.Had a feeling once Carsland opened Autopia would be mentioned often in rumours about its demise. I would hate to see it go being it is an original but it is very dated. As for Finding Nemo we will not miss it if it goes.
Umm.. Al is not a news source or a Disney source. I never quite understand why we here on DIS give him so much focus. He is a blogger who runs a message board site who sniffs out Disney rumors and writes about them. I would not call ANYTHING Al writes about to be "sound proof."um I would just like to go on record saying I said this earlier. I mentioned that a CM told me there was going to be a big remodel in TOmorroland after DCA that involved heavily around Autotopia. Not everyone believed it. Hopefully this is more sound proof, towards what I said.
Again, riding in a submarine is an old concept, but for the "every man," it is an experience most will never have. For kids, driving is future. Rockets? Okay, yes there has been space exploration, but again, the "every man" cannot just fly around town.Yeah...I figured that.
As far as coming up with new rides, it seems that it takes so long to plan/build them that anything "futuristic" will be outdated by the time it's finally implemented.
Have you been inside Innoventions in a long while? There are some pretty cool things in there. I think it is one of those attractions that you either "get" and enjoy or don't "get" and can't see the purpose of its existence....As for Tomorrowland, I was THRILLED to hear this is in the talking stage right now. I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to see them get rid of innovations....
I'm sorry, I'm not understanding your post. Are they adding to Fantasyland or Frontierland, according to the CM you spoke with on the Lily Belle?no not just frontier land according to the cm on lilly bell in may yes they are adding to FL in DL the back part isnt used and they can add alot more to it.
While I agree that TL must change to stay "future," I believe that a lot of attractions in TL that have been there a long time, many are still "future" for the "every person." Most of us cannot ride in a submarine or fly an airplane/rocket. And kids LOVE the idea of being able to drive. They are experiences that still have value in 2012. Now, a 3D theatre is an idea that has become commonplace and there is really nothing "Tomorrow" about it to anyone anymore....Tomorrowland especially must remove rides because the vision of the future changes so much over the last 50+ years.
Hmmm, I think that ASIMO is pretty amazing. I LOVE the Peter Pan story in Innoventions. The kitchen is pretty fun. And although I could do without it, people seem to LOVE being able to play with the various Xbox Kinect games in there. They are always being used. There's some fun stuff in that spinning building, imo....Funny, as much as I hate Innoventions and think it's a bore, the original Carousel of Progess was quite well done. Somehow, in creating Innoventions, they took away the creativity and animatronics, and just left behind the final afterthought of CoP, the demos and displays. Took all the life out of it....
Now THAT is something we definitely agree on! BRING BACK THE BEARS!!!And yeah, I agree, bring back the Country Bears!!!
Oh, it's nothing like a zoo, it's amazing and wonderful and you must find a way to go visit. In fact, I cringe at the thought that it would even be called a zoo. It's soooo not. We LOVE the AK. So much so... we bought DVC there....My point was that when I hear "zoo" I don't think Disney magic. But from what I've heard, as I have not been there, Animal Kingdom is more than that. It's not a zoo, it's Disney magic.
No, originally it housed GE's Carousel of Progress. That later closed down and was replaced by America Sings. So if Disney had done as you suggest and leave the original rides alone, you would have never seen America Sings.
Funny, as much as I hate Innoventions and think it's a bore, the original Carousel of Progess was quite well done. Somehow, in creating Innoventions, they took away the creativity and animatronics, and just left behind the final afterthought of CoP, the demos and displays. Took all the life out of it.
I liked America Sings well enough, too. But Carousel of Progress was original and innovative.
And yeah, I agree, bring back the Country Bears!!!
-Bob
No, originally it housed GE's Carousel of Progress. That later closed down and was replaced by America Sings. So if Disney had done as you suggest and leave the original rides alone, you would have never seen America Sings.
Funny, as much as I hate Innoventions and think it's a bore, the original Carousel of Progess was quite well done. Somehow, in creating Innoventions, they took away the creativity and animatronics, and just left behind the final afterthought of CoP, the demos and displays. Took all the life out of it.
I liked America Sings well enough, too. But Carousel of Progress was original and innovative.
And yeah, I agree, bring back the Country Bears!!!
-Bob
bring back the Country Bears!!!![]()
I really liked the Country Bears as a kid and was eager to have my kids experience them at WDW, but honestly I was shocked at how slow, dusty, and deserted the show was. However, I would welcome a freshened-up version at DL. I think there is plenty of appeal left in them, and Critter Country could stand to have another attraction.
Country Bears 3000--Hillbillies of the Future!